Infinix Zero 5G 2023 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the edge thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Infinix Zero 5G 2023 is a solid performer, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience, especially for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 5G 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 01 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - X6815D | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) - X6815D | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pearly White, Coral Orange, Submarine Black | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | X6815C, X6815D | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 5G 2023
- Sleek Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Competitive Price
- Slower Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Potentially Less Refined Camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Bright Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Potentially Better Camera
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design may be less striking to some
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display (890 nits vs. likely around 450-500 nits for the Infinix), making it easier to view content outdoors. While both feature AMOLED panels, the Redmi's higher brightness and potentially better color accuracy give it a noticeable advantage. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Redmi suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both offer capable camera systems, the Redmi Note 12 Pro is expected to have a more refined camera software and potentially better image processing. The Redmi's camera setup likely includes a higher resolution main sensor, leading to more detailed photos. Low-light performance is also likely to be better on the Redmi.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset, so raw performance should be quite similar. However, software optimization and RAM management could differ. Expect smooth everyday usage on both devices, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro might handle more demanding games slightly better due to potentially better thermal management.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 97 hours is exceptional, and the 67W fast charging is a game-changer, reaching 50% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes. The Infinix Zero 5G 2023's 33W charging is slower, and its battery life, while decent, doesn't match the Redmi's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Zero 5G 2023 is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a sleek design on a tighter budget. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better choice for those who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and extended battery life, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.