Infinix Zero 40 vs Oppo Reno10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Infinix Zero 40 is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Reno10 Pro offers superior battery endurance and a refined software experience, making it ideal for those who value longevity and stability over peak performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 40 | Oppo Reno10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 08 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR, 144Hz, 1300 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14.5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 60% in 25 min 20W wireless 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging 2.0 | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3 Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Violet Garden, Moving Titanium | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | X6861 | CPH2525 |
| Price | ₹ 27,999 | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
Infinix Zero 40
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 8200 Ultimate)
- Faster wired and wireless charging speeds
- Bypass Charging 2.0 for gaming convenience
- Battery life likely shorter than the Reno10 Pro
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo’s ColorOS
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- Excellent battery life and endurance
- Fast 80W wired charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Refined and stable software experience (ColorOS)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Zero 40
- Lacks wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 793 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the Infinix Zero 40’s display specs aren’t provided, the Reno10 Pro’s brightness provides a clear benchmark. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the Reno10 Pro’s brightness suggests a potentially more vibrant and readable experience in direct sunlight. Further analysis would require knowing the Zero 40’s panel characteristics, including refresh rate and PWM dimming frequency, to assess potential eye strain.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Oppo’s image processing is generally known for its natural color reproduction and strong dynamic range, while Infinix often leans towards more saturated and vibrant images. The Reno10 Pro’s video capabilities are likely more refined, benefiting from Qualcomm’s ISP. The presence of OIS on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and stable video recording.
Performance
The Infinix Zero 40’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4nm) significantly outpaces the Oppo Reno10 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) in raw processing power. The Dimensity 8200 Ultimate’s Cortex-A78 cores clocked at up to 3.1 GHz, combined with the more efficient 4nm process, deliver a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 778G, while capable, is geared towards efficiency and smooth everyday use. The 4nm node of the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate also translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Zero 40 is the clear choice for power users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:05h and an endurance rating of 104h. This suggests excellent power management and optimization. The Infinix Zero 40’s battery capacity is not specified, but its more powerful chipset and faster 45W charging (60% in 25 minutes) suggest a trade-off between speed and longevity. The Reno10 Pro’s 80W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is also impressive, but the Zero 40 adds the convenience of 20W wireless charging and 10W reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. The Zero 40’s Bypass Charging 2.0 feature, allowing charging while gaming, is a unique advantage for mobile gamers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 40 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or frequent multitasking, and value the convenience of 45W wired and 20W wireless charging. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if you prefer a phone that lasts all day on a single charge, offers a consistently smooth experience, and benefits from Oppo’s established software ecosystem.