Infinix Zero 40 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a remains a strong choice. However, the Infinix Zero 40 offers significantly faster charging and superior raw performance thanks to the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 40 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 08 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR, 144Hz, 1300 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14.5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 60% in 25 min 20W wireless 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging 2.0 | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Violet Garden, Moving Titanium | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | X6861 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 27,999 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Infinix Zero 40
- Significantly faster 45W wired charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate processor
- 20W wireless charging and 10W reverse charging
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Clean and timely software updates from Google
- Strong brand reputation for software experience
- Slow 18W wired charging
- Less powerful Tensor G2 processor compared to Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Infinix Zero 40’s display specifications aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a comparable OLED panel. However, the Pixel 7a’s color accuracy is a known strength, benefiting from Google’s calibration. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting power efficiency during prolonged use. Bezels are likely similar, given both phones target a similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent photos and videos. While the Infinix Zero 40’s camera specifications are not detailed, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s software optimization. The Pixel 7a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Zero 40 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 7a’s established reputation in this area gives it a significant advantage. We can assume the Pixel 7a will have superior video stabilization and overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Zero 40’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4nm) features a powerful CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – designed for sustained performance. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, with a CPU configuration of 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate generally translates to better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Infinix Zero 40 is likely to outperform the Pixel 7a in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating respectable battery life. However, the Infinix Zero 40 significantly outpaces it in charging speed with 45W wired charging (60% in 25 minutes), 20W wireless, and 10W reverse wired charging. The Pixel 7a is limited to 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless. While the Pixel 7a’s battery endurance is good, the Zero 40’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day. The addition of Bypass Charging 2.0 on the Zero 40 further enhances battery health by reducing heat during charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 40 if you need a phone that charges incredibly quickly, handles demanding games with ease, and offers a powerful processor for multitasking. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a consistently excellent camera experience, clean software updates directly from Google, and a refined user interface, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power and charging speed.