Infinix Zero 30 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Comparison

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Zero 30 and Samsung Galaxy A54 represent compelling options. The Zero 30 aims to disrupt with its powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8020 chipset and rapid 68W charging, while the Galaxy A54 leverages Samsung’s established brand recognition, refined software, and efficient Exynos 1380 processor. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the Infinix Zero 30 is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a more polished software experience, slightly better battery endurance, and a brighter display, making it a strong contender for those valuing refinement and longevity.

PHONES
Phone Names Infinix Zero 30 Samsung Galaxy A54
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2023, September 012023, March 15
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, SeptemberAvailable. Released 2023, March 24
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions164.5 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.31 in)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight185 g (6.53 oz)202 g (7.13 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 950 nits (peak)Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G68 MP5
OSAndroid 13, XOS 13Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single-32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.450 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesLED flash-
Single50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with dual speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
BluetoothYes5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only)
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging68W wired, 80% in 30 min25W wired
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsRome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy PurpleLime, Graphite, Violet, White
ModelsX6731SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W
Price-€ 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999
SAR-0.81 W/kg (head)     0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.69 W/kg (head)     1.34 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.6 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Infinix Zero 30

  • Faster 68W charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • More powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset for demanding tasks.
  • Potentially higher peak display brightness.

  • Lower battery endurance rating compared to the A54.
  • Less established brand reputation and software support.

Samsung Galaxy A54

  • Longer battery life and better power efficiency.
  • Refined Samsung software experience with guaranteed updates.
  • Brighter display in typical usage due to contrast ratio.

  • Slower 25W charging.
  • Less powerful chipset for intensive gaming and video editing.

Display Comparison

Both phones feature excellent displays, but with key differences. The Galaxy A54 boasts a peak brightness of 980 nits, slightly dimmer than the Infinix Zero 30’s 764 nits, but Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio likely contributes to a more visually striking image in real-world use. While both are excellent, the A54’s higher brightness will be more noticeable outdoors. Neither manufacturer specifies PWM dimming rates, a crucial factor for users sensitive to flicker, requiring further investigation. The A54’s panel is likely a Super AMOLED, known for its vibrant colors, while the Zero 30’s panel type isn’t specified, potentially impacting color accuracy.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Both are advertised as capable of photo and video, but without specifics on sensor size or aperture, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests a focus on software processing rather than hardware differentiation. The A54’s reputation for consistent image quality and reliable video stabilization gives it an edge, assuming similar hardware. The Zero 30 may attempt to differentiate with unique software features, but without concrete data, it’s hard to assess.

Performance

The Infinix Zero 30’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) and the Samsung Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The 5nm process of the Exynos 1380 generally translates to better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer sustained performance under load. However, the Dimensity 8020’s Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz offer a slight edge in peak CPU performance compared to the A54’s 2.4 GHz cores. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The real-world impact will depend on software optimization and thermal management, but the Zero 30 is likely to handle graphically intensive tasks with a bit more headroom.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A54 claims an endurance rating of 119 hours, based on its battery capacity and power efficiency, while the Infinix Zero 30 has a rating of 102 hours. However, the A54’s 11:15h active use score provides a more realistic picture of real-world performance. The Zero 30 compensates with significantly faster 68W wired charging, achieving 80% charge in just 30 minutes, compared to the A54’s slower 25W charging. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Zero 30, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Infinix Zero 30 if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if fast charging is a top priority. You’ll benefit from the Dimensity 8020’s processing power and the convenience of a quick top-up. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on software stability, long-term battery life, and a vibrant, easily visible display, even in bright sunlight.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380 is generally efficient, but sustained gaming can lead to thermal throttling. Samsung’s software optimization helps mitigate this, but users playing demanding titles for extended periods may experience some performance drops. The 5nm process helps, but it's not immune to heat.
❓ Is the 68W charging on the Infinix Zero 30 compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While Infinix doesn't explicitly state PD compatibility, their 68W charging utilizes a proprietary protocol. It's best to use the included charger for optimal charging speeds. Using a standard USB-PD charger will likely result in slower charging times.
❓ How does the software update policy differ between Infinix and Samsung?
Samsung provides a more robust and guaranteed software update policy, typically offering 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security patches. Infinix’s update commitment is less clear and historically shorter, which is a significant consideration for long-term software support.
❓ What type of storage does each phone use, and is it expandable?
Neither device explicitly states the storage type (UFS 3.1 is likely for both). The Galaxy A54 supports microSD card expansion up to 1TB, providing flexibility for storage. The Infinix Zero 30 does *not* offer microSD card expansion, so choosing the appropriate storage capacity at purchase is crucial.