Infinix Zero 30 vs Nothing Phone (2): A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Nothing Phone (2) emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the inclusion of wireless charging adds convenience. However, the Infinix Zero 30 offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 30 | Nothing Phone (2) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 01 | 2023, July 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, July 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 201.2 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 950 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, live HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1), NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 80% in 30 min | 45W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC4, 100% in 55 min 15W wireless, 100% in 130 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple | White, Dark Gray |
| Models | X6731 | A065 |
| Price | - | $ 379.99 / £ 370.00 |
Infinix Zero 30
- Significantly faster wired charging (68W)
- More affordable price point
- Competitive endurance rating
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 8020)
- No wireless charging support
- Potentially inferior camera performance
Nothing Phone (2)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera quality
- Slower wired charging (45W)
- Higher price point
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
Both the Infinix Zero 30 and Nothing Phone (2) feature excellent displays, but with subtle differences. The Nothing Phone (2) boasts a slightly brighter panel at 998 nits compared to the Zero 30’s 764 nits, making it marginally better for outdoor visibility. While both are likely OLED panels (inferred from the market segment), the lack of specific panel technology details prevents a deeper analysis of color accuracy and viewing angles. The Nothing Phone (2)'s design also incorporates a more uniform bezel, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, and optical image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nothing Phone (2) likely employs a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of OIS on the Nothing Phone (2) is also probable, further enhancing image stability. We can assume both phones will offer a variety of shooting modes, but the quality will likely lean towards the Nothing Phone (2).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nothing Phone (2) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a previous-generation flagship processor, while the Infinix Zero 30 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8020 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s 4nm process offers superior thermal efficiency, translating to sustained performance under load. The CPU architecture also favors the Snapdragon, with its Cortex-X2 prime core (3.0 GHz) providing a significant boost in single-core performance compared to the Zero 30’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz). This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and applications. The Nothing Phone (2) also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x, inferred from its positioning).
Battery Life
The endurance ratings are remarkably similar, with both phones achieving around 102-103 hours. However, the Nothing Phone (2) achieves a more impressive 14:21 hours of active use, suggesting better power efficiency despite the more powerful chipset. The Infinix Zero 30 compensates with significantly faster wired charging at 68W, reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Nothing Phone (2) offers 45W wired charging (taking 55 minutes for a full charge), 15W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging – features absent on the Zero 30. This makes the Nothing Phone (2) more versatile for users who value wireless convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 30 if you need a phone that prioritizes fast charging and solid performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, all while staying within a tighter budget. Buy the Nothing Phone (2) if you prefer a more polished software experience, faster overall performance for demanding applications and gaming, and the added convenience of wireless charging, even at a higher price point.