Infinix Zero 30 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and display brightness, the Infinix Zero 30 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset and higher peak brightness offer a noticeable advantage, despite the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s slightly better battery endurance score. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s faster initial charging speed is a compelling counterpoint.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 30 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 01 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 80% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | X6731 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Infinix Zero 30
- More powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- Higher endurance rating for longer runtime
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Lower peak display brightness
- Slower initial charging speed
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster initial charging (50% in 15 min)
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Lower endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching 1073 nits compared to the Infinix Zero 30’s 764 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, giving the Edge 40 Neo a clear advantage for outdoor visibility. While both utilize 6.67-inch AMOLED panels, the higher peak brightness of the Motorola translates to more vivid HDR content. We lack data on refresh rates and panel type (LTPO vs standard), but the brightness difference is a significant differentiator. The Zero 30’s lower brightness isn’t *bad*, but the Edge 40 Neo offers a superior viewing experience in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both devices are advertised as capable of both Photo and Video capture. However, the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage, particularly for low-light photography and video recording. We can assume both phones will offer a range of shooting modes, but image processing styles will likely differ, with Infinix often leaning towards more saturated colors and Motorola aiming for a more natural look.
Performance
The Infinix Zero 30’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) represents a step up in processing power compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The Zero 30’s CPU configuration – 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a higher clock speed on its prime cores than the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the 8020’s architecture offers a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads. The Edge 40 Neo’s CPU configuration prioritizes efficiency, potentially leading to slightly better power management during less intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo achieves an active use score of 10:28h, translating to an endurance rating of 80h, while the Infinix Zero 30 boasts an endurance rating of 102h. However, endurance ratings are based on a standardized test and don’t always reflect real-world usage. The Edge 40 Neo compensates for its slightly smaller battery with faster charging – 50% in 15 minutes – compared to the Zero 30’s 80% in 30 minutes. This means the Edge 40 Neo can quickly top up its battery when needed, while the Zero 30 offers a longer overall runtime between charges. The 68W wired charging on both devices is competitive, but the Edge 40 Neo’s speed is a clear advantage for users who frequently need a quick boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 30 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease, and value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a more balanced experience with slightly longer battery life and faster initial charging, and prefer a more refined software experience typical of Motorola.