Infinix Zero 30 4G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 68W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Infinix Zero 30 4G remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 30 4G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 26 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4 2 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 75% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunset Gold, Misty Green, Pearly White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | X6731B | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Infinix Zero 30 4G
- Potentially more affordable price
- Stylish design (based on Infinix branding)
- 45W fast charging is still convenient
- Less powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Likely shorter battery life
- Slower charging compared to the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster processor (Dimensity 7030)
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Ultra-fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Higher price point
- May lack some of the design flair of the Zero 30 4G
- Software updates may be slower than some competitors
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Infinix Zero 30 4G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness is a significant advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The panel technology is not specified for either device, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness suggests a higher-quality panel overall. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s superior brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is likely to offer a more refined camera experience due to its image processing capabilities and potentially larger sensor size. The absence of details on the Infinix Zero 30 4G’s camera suggests it may rely more heavily on software processing, which can sometimes lead to less natural-looking images. Without specific sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Motorola’s history suggests a focus on image quality. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of lenses, but the Edge 40 Neo likely has the edge in overall image quality.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) offers a clear performance advantage over the Infinix Zero 30 4G’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7030 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speed, results in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7030’s more modern core design provides superior efficiency and performance. Gamers and power users will benefit from the Edge 40 Neo’s more capable chipset.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate excellent battery life. The 68W wired charging is a game-changer, delivering a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Infinix Zero 30 4G’s 45W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 75%. While the Zero 30 4G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of battery life and charging speed makes it the clear winner for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 30 4G if you need a stylish phone with a focus on design and are willing to trade some performance and battery longevity for a lower price point. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more well-rounded experience with a faster processor, longer battery life, and significantly quicker charging speeds, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.