Google Pixel 7a vs. Infinix Zero 30 4G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice, primarily due to its significantly better camera system and the benefits of the Tensor G2 chip's image processing. However, the Infinix Zero 30 4G offers a compelling value proposition for those prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 30 4G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 26 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 26 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4 2 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 75% in 30 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunset Gold, Misty Green, Pearly White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | X6731B | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Infinix Zero 30 4G
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- Faster and more efficient Tensor G2 chipset
- Long-term software support from Google
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Higher price point
Google Pixel 7a
- Extremely fast 45W charging
- More affordable price
- Stylish design
- Less powerful Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Inferior camera performance
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix Zero 30 4G’s display specifications aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a lower peak brightness. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel likely offers superior color accuracy and contrast. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel’s superior brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The Infinix Zero 30 4G likely offers a decent camera experience for its price point, but it won’t match the Pixel’s image processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording is also expected to be superior, benefiting from advanced stabilization and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the Infinix Zero 30 4G’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). The Helio G99, while efficient, relies on older Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a noticeable advantage for the Pixel 7a in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. The Tensor G2 also benefits from dedicated AI processing capabilities, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. While the Infinix may handle daily tasks well, the Pixel 7a provides a smoother, more responsive experience overall.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. The Infinix Zero 30 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 45W wired charging (with PD3.0) is a significant advantage over the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. The Infinix can reach 75% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Pixel 7a will take considerably longer. This makes the Infinix a better choice for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. However, the Pixel 7a’s more efficient chipset and software optimization may offset the charging speed difference for some users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 30 4G if you need a phone with exceptionally fast 45W charging and prioritize a stylish design without breaking the bank. You'll appreciate its responsiveness for everyday tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, smooth performance with demanding apps, and benefit from Google’s software features and long-term support, even if it means slower charging.