Infinix Zero 20 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison

The Infinix Zero 20 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Zero 20 prioritizes a sleek design and fast charging with the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G leans on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695 and a larger battery capacity. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a modern aesthetic, the Infinix Zero 20 emerges as the winner. Its 45W charging significantly outperforms the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W in real-world 0-75% speed, and the Helio G99 offers comparable performance to the Snapdragon 695 for everyday tasks. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s endurance rating is a strong point for heavy users.

PHONES
Phone Names Infinix Zero 20 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2022, October 052022, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, January 02Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions164.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight196 g (6.91 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619
OSAndroid 12, XOS 12Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesQuad-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple108 MP, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, AF 2 MP108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1440p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDRHDR, panorama
Single60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1440p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with dual speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
BluetoothYes5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging45W wired, 75% in 30 min67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min
Type4500 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSpace Gray, Glitter Gold, Green FantasyLaser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow
ModelsX68212201116PG
PriceAbout 200 EUR€ 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940
SAR-1.06 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.8 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Infinix Zero 20

  • Faster initial charging speed (0-75% in 30 mins)
  • Potentially slightly better single-core CPU performance
  • Sleek and modern design (inferred from brand positioning)

  • Battery capacity is unknown, potentially smaller than Poco X4 Pro 5G
  • Limited details on camera specifications

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

  • Longer battery life (119h endurance rating)
  • Qualcomm 5G modem for potentially more stable connectivity
  • Supports PD3.0 and QC3 fast charging standards

  • Slower charging speed compared to Infinix Zero 20 (0-70% in 22 mins)
  • Snapdragon 695 may offer less peak CPU performance

Display Comparison

Both the Infinix Zero 20 and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rates are missing. Given the market positioning, we can infer both likely target FHD+ resolution. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective price brackets.

Camera Comparison

Both devices advertise photo and video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to assess image quality potential. The absence of details regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced stabilization. Lens apertures are also unknown, impacting low-light performance. The focus should be on real-world image samples to determine which phone delivers more pleasing results. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones likely include one, but these are generally of limited utility.

Performance

The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Zero 20’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) and the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) are both 6nm-based, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the Helio G99 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2GHz, while the Snapdragon 695 employs Kryo 660 Gold cores at the same speed. While clock speeds are similar, the Cortex-A76 architecture generally offers a slight edge in single-core performance. The Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s integrated 5G modem, potentially offering more stable and faster 5G connectivity. Both phones are paired with an unspecified amount of RAM, but LPDDR5 or LPDDR4X would be typical for this segment, impacting multitasking responsiveness.

Battery Life

The Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating a larger battery capacity optimized for longevity. While the Infinix Zero 20’s battery capacity is unspecified, its 45W wired charging is a key differentiator. The Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3, reaching 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. However, the Zero 20 claims 75% charge in just 30 minutes, suggesting a faster initial charging curve, even with lower peak wattage. This makes the Zero 20 ideal for quick top-ups, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G excels at lasting a full day on a single charge.

Buying Guide

Buy the Infinix Zero 20 if you need a stylish phone with exceptionally fast partial charging – ideal for those who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize extended battery life and are willing to trade some charging speed for it. The Poco X4 Pro 5G is also a better choice for users who heavily rely on 5G connectivity and want a proven Qualcomm chipset.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Helio G99 in the Infinix Zero 20 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Helio G99 is a capable chipset, but Genshin Impact is notoriously demanding. Expect to play at medium settings with moderate frame rates. The Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G will offer a similar gaming experience, with neither chipset being ideal for high-end gaming.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G significantly faster than the 45W charging on the Infinix Zero 20 in real-world use?
While 67W appears higher, the Infinix Zero 20 charges to 75% in just 30 minutes, suggesting a more aggressive initial charging curve. The Poco X4 Pro 5G takes 22 minutes to reach 70%, but 41 minutes for a full charge. For users who primarily top up their phones, the Zero 20’s faster partial charging is more beneficial.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the Snapdragon 695 and the modem used in the Infinix Zero 20?
The Snapdragon 695 integrates a Qualcomm 5G modem, known for its stability and wide band support. The Infinix Zero 20 relies on a separate modem, and while it supports 5G, it may not offer the same level of consistent performance or compatibility across different 5G networks.