The Xiaomi Poco F4 and Infinix Zero 20 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F4, leveraging the proven Snapdragon 870, aims for flagship-level performance at a more accessible price. Conversely, the Infinix Zero 20 focuses on a balance of features, including rapid charging, powered by the Mediatek Helio G99. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Infinix Zero 20 offers a compelling alternative with its 45W charging and potentially lower price point, making it ideal for users who value speed of recharge over peak processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 02 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, (wide), PDAF
13 MP, AF
2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 75% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Glitter Gold, Green Fantasy | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | X6821 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 200 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 20
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 870
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Faster full charge time (38 minutes)
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Faster charging to 75% (30 minutes)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Lower CPU and GPU performance
- Likely dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1003 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix Zero 20’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Poco F4’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong AMOLED panel, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the Zero 20 suggests it may not match the smoothness potentially offered by the Poco F4, which is common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Infinix Zero 20. The Poco F4 likely benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 870, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. Without specific details on the Zero 20’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic photography. The absence of information suggests a focus on software enhancements rather than premium hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Zero 20’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, deliver significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. While the Helio G99 is a capable chip, its Cortex-A76 and A55 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz and 2.0 GHz respectively, are less powerful. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Poco F4. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Zero 20). However, the charging speeds are markedly different. The Poco F4 supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving a full charge in 38 minutes. The Infinix Zero 20, with its 45W charging, reaches 75% charge in 30 minutes. While the Zero 20 is faster to 75%, the Poco F4 completes the full charge cycle quicker, offering greater convenience for users who need a complete top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 20 if you need a phone that can quickly top up its battery, prioritizing convenience and minimizing downtime. Its 45W charging is a significant advantage for those constantly on the move. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and are willing to trade some charging speed for superior processing capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 experience significant throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 870 is a powerful chip, it can experience some throttling under sustained heavy load. However, the 7nm process node and the Poco F4’s cooling system are generally effective at mitigating this, allowing for extended gaming sessions with minimal performance drops compared to less efficient chipsets.
❓ How does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Infinix Zero 20 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G99 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It won’t deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 870, but it’s sufficient for casual gaming.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Infinix Zero 20 enough for a full day of moderate use?
Yes, 45W charging is quite fast and should be sufficient to top up the battery quickly, even with moderate to heavy usage. Reaching 75% in 30 minutes provides a substantial boost, and the full charge time is reasonable.
❓ Does the Poco F4 support expandable storage via microSD card?
No, the Xiaomi Poco F4 does not support microSD card expansion. Users are limited to the internal storage option they choose at the time of purchase, so selecting an appropriate storage capacity is crucial.
