Infinix Zero 20 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks and gaming, offsetting the Zero 20’s faster charging and potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 20 | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 02 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, AF 2 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 75% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Glitter Gold, Green Fantasy | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | X6821 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Zero 20
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Stylish design (assumed based on Infinix branding)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G99)
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Samsung’s One UI offers a smoother experience
- Superior camera capabilities (likely)
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung’s software can include bloatware
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, display details are missing. Assuming the A73 5G follows Samsung’s typical mid-range strategy, it likely features a Super AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. The Zero 20, given its price point, may employ an LCD panel. The A73’s potential for higher peak brightness and superior color accuracy would be a significant advantage for outdoor visibility and media consumption. Bezels are likely comparable, but Samsung’s manufacturing process generally yields tighter tolerances.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications beyond the main sensors are unavailable for the Zero 20. The A73 5G’s camera system, while not flagship-level, benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise. The Snapdragon 778G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more capable than the Helio G99’s. While megapixel counts aren’t everything, a larger sensor size (likely on the A73) combined with a wider aperture will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The A73’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a crucial advantage for steady videos and sharper photos in challenging conditions. We can assume the Zero 20 will include a suite of standard camera modes, but the A73 will likely offer more refined computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – compared to the Infinix Zero 20’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The A78 cores in the Snapdragon 778G offer a substantial performance uplift in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The A73 also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero 20’s 45W wired charging is a clear win, promising a 75% charge in just 30 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is limited to 25W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. However, battery life is not solely determined by charging speed. The efficiency of the chipset and software optimization play a significant role. While the exact battery capacities are unknown, the Snapdragon 778G’s 6nm process and optimized power management could potentially offset the charging speed difference, delivering comparable real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 20 if you prioritize rapid 45W charging and a sleek aesthetic, and are comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t heavily rely on intensive mobile gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you value consistent performance, a more established brand ecosystem, and a smoother user interface. This phone is best suited for users who multitask frequently, enjoy mobile gaming, and appreciate Samsung’s One UI.