Infinix Zero 20 vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter display and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging and 1004 nits peak brightness offer a more convenient and visually pleasing experience, despite the slightly less powerful processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 20 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 02 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, AF 2 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, (wide), AF, OIS | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 75% in 30 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Glitter Gold, Green Fantasy | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | X6821 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 20
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance due to Helio G99 architecture.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Faster CPU clock speeds on the primary cores.
- Slower charging speed (45W vs 68W).
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lower brightness.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly brighter display (1004 nits).
- Faster 68W wired and 5W wireless charging.
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds on the primary cores.
- Potentially less consistent frame rates in demanding games.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display quality with a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even under direct sunlight. While the Infinix Zero 20’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 30 Neo’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The Edge 30 Neo’s smaller 5.9-inch screen size compared to the Zero 20’s likely contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups. However, without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone will be a standout performer in low-light photography. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro cameras on either device is questionable, offering limited practical benefit over the main sensor.
Performance
Both the Infinix Zero 20 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo utilize 6nm process nodes, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the chipsets differ significantly. The Zero 20’s MediaTek Helio G99 features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, geared towards sustained performance. The Edge 30 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G employs 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are similar, Qualcomm’s Kryo cores generally offer better single-core performance, beneficial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. The G99’s architecture, however, may provide more consistent frame rates during extended gaming sessions. The Edge 30 Neo’s 5G modem is a clear advantage for future-proofing.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the Infinix Zero 20’s 45W charging. The Edge 30 Neo can also charge wirelessly at 5W, a feature absent on the Zero 20. Both phones share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different capacities. The faster charging of the Edge 30 Neo translates to significantly less downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The 75% charge in 30 minutes claim for the Zero 20 is slower than the Edge 30 Neo’s likely full charge in a similar timeframe.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 20 if you need a phone primarily for media consumption and light gaming, and value a processor optimized for sustained performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more versatile device with faster charging, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a more compact form factor, even if it means a slight trade-off in raw processing power.