Infinix Xpad vs Realme Pad X: Which Budget Tablet Reigns Supreme?

The tablet market is heating up, particularly in the budget segment. The Infinix Xpad and Realme Pad X both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on performance, display quality, and charging capabilities to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Realme Pad X emerges as the better choice. Its brighter, higher-contrast display and significantly faster 33W charging with Power Delivery outweigh the Xpad’s slightly different CPU architecture. While the Xpad offers a competitive chipset, the Realme Pad X provides a more polished and convenient user experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Infinix Xpad Realme Pad X
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsLTELTE
5G bands-SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE - cellular model onlyHSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, August 122022, May 25
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, August 18Available. Released 2022, June 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, aluminum backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions257 x 168.6 x 7.6 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.30 in)256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in)
SIMNano-SIM (cellular model only)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight496 g (1.09 lb)499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb)
 -Stylus support (magnetic charging)
Display
Resolution1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density)
Size11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio)10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 440 nitsIPS LCD, 450 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619
OSAndroid 14, XOS 14Android, Realme UI 3.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesQuad-LED flash-
Single8 MP13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Video1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash-
Single8 MP8 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS - cellular model onlyGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired, 50% in 40 min33W wired, PD 5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 7000 mAh8340 mAh
Misc
ColorsTitan Gold, Frost Blue, Stellar GreyGlowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green
ModelsX1101RMP2107, RMP2108
PriceAbout 140 EURAbout 250 EUR
Tests
Display- Contrast ratio: 1664:1
Loudspeaker- -22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
Performance- AnTuTu: 395824 (v9) GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Infinix Xpad

  • Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Cortex-A76 cores
  • Competitive chipset for the price range
  • 6nm process for good power efficiency

  • Slower 18W charging
  • Limited display specifications
  • Lack of Power Delivery support

Realme Pad X

  • Brighter and higher contrast display (496 nits)
  • Faster 33W charging with Power Delivery
  • Integrated 5G modem for future-proofing

  • Cortex-A55 cores may offer slightly lower peak performance
  • Potentially less sustained performance under heavy load
  • Software updates may be less frequent than some competitors

Display Comparison

The Realme Pad X boasts a superior display experience. While both tablets share a similar contrast ratio around 1660:1, the Realme Pad X’s measured peak brightness of 496 nits significantly outshines the unlisted brightness of the Infinix Xpad. This translates to better visibility in bright environments. The Realme Pad X’s display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience for videos and games. The Xpad’s display specifications are currently limited, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Realme Pad X clearly has the edge in measured performance.

Camera Comparison

Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specs are limited. Without further information, it’s difficult to draw definitive conclusions. However, given the market segment, it’s likely both feature similar basic camera setups. Focusing on the core processing capabilities of the chipsets, the Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) likely offers slightly better image processing capabilities, but the real-world difference will be minimal for casual users.

Performance

Both tablets utilize 6nm process nodes, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the chipsets differ significantly. The Realme Pad X’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G features Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores, optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Infinix Xpad employs the MediaTek Helio G99, utilizing Cortex-A76 cores for peak performance and Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. While the A76 cores in the Helio G99 *can* offer higher single-core performance, the Snapdragon 695’s integrated 5G modem and Qualcomm’s software optimizations provide a more consistent and refined experience. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from a more mature software ecosystem, potentially leading to better game compatibility and optimization.

Battery Life

The charging experience is a clear win for the Realme Pad X. Its 33W wired charging with Power Delivery support allows for a significantly faster charge time compared to the Infinix Xpad’s 18W charging. The Realme Pad X also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Realme Pad X mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage, ensuring less downtime and greater convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Infinix Xpad if you prioritize a potentially longer sustained performance under load due to the Cortex-A76 cores and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme Pad X if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and a significantly faster charging experience, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their tablet on the go.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Realme Pad X struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The Realme Pad X’s thermal management will be key, but the Snapdragon 695 is generally more efficient than the Helio G99 under sustained load, potentially leading to less throttling.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Infinix Xpad slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is noticeably slower than the 33W charging on the Realme Pad X. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Infinix Xpad, potentially taking over 3 hours for a full charge from 0%. This is a significant drawback for users who frequently need to top up their tablet.
❓ Does the Realme Pad X support external displays via USB-C?
While not explicitly stated, the presence of a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alternate Mode support is highly probable given the Snapdragon 695’s capabilities. This would allow you to connect the Realme Pad X to an external monitor or TV for a larger viewing experience.