The Android tablet market is heating up, with the Infinix Xpad GT offering a compelling price-to-performance ratio, while the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 aims for a premium experience with cutting-edge technology. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two devices, focusing on their processing power, display capabilities, and charging speeds to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and improved efficiency compared to the Xpad GT’s Snapdragon 888. The 120W charging is a massive convenience, offsetting the slightly similar battery life scores.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 21 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 04 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 291.7 x 191.1 x 6.5 mm (11.48 x 7.52 x 0.26 in) | 278.7 x 191.6 x 6.3 mm (10.97 x 7.54 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 655 g (1.44 lb) | 590 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 2880 x 1840 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 2032 x 3048 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 13.0 inches, 494.7 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 457.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 700 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 9 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| NFC | No | Yes (file transfer only) |
| Positioning | Unspecified | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
10W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 10000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Stellar Gray | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | X1301 | 24018RPACG |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Xpad GT
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life
- Capable Snapdragon 888 processor for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and contrast
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Higher price tag
- May not represent a huge leap in battery life over the Xpad GT
- Premium price may not be justified for casual users
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 848 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the Xpad GT. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize IPS LCD technology (based on market positioning), the Xiaomi’s 1378:1 contrast ratio suggests a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate data for the Xpad GT makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is likely to offer a smoother experience if it supports a higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Given the tablet form factor, camera performance isn't a primary concern. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is likely to have a more refined camera system due to its higher price point and focus on overall quality. Without specific camera specs for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but Xiaomi generally prioritizes image processing and sensor quality. The Xpad GT likely relies on software optimization to compensate for potentially lower-end hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the Infinix Xpad GT’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The Gen 2 features the newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside improved Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, resulting in a substantial performance uplift in both CPU and GPU tasks. The 4nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning the Xiaomi is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While the Xpad GT’s Snapdragon 888 is still capable, it will struggle with the most demanding games and applications compared to the 6S Pro.
Battery Life
Both tablets exhibit remarkably similar battery life in active use, scoring 11:23h for the Infinix Xpad GT and 11:14h for the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes. The Infinix Xpad GT’s 33W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach full capacity. The Xiaomi also supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Xpad GT if you prioritize value and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s ideal for casual users, media consumption, and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 if you demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or intensive gaming, and if you value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. It’s a worthwhile investment for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 888 in the Infinix Xpad GT struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 888 is capable, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will handle these games with ease at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 compared to the 33W charging on the Infinix Xpad GT in a real-world scenario?
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 35 minutes, while the Infinix Xpad GT will take well over an hour. This means you can quickly top up the Xiaomi during short breaks, making it ideal for users on the go.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process and Xiaomi’s thermal management system are designed to minimize throttling. While some heat is inevitable during intensive gaming, the 6S Pro is less prone to overheating compared to devices with older chipsets like the Xpad GT’s Snapdragon 888.
