The sub-$100 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Smart 8 HD and itel Vision 3 Turbo are two contenders vying for dominance. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience for the budget-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the Infinix Smart 8 HD emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc T606 chipset, built on a more modern 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s older 28nm Unisoc SC9863A, making it more responsive for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 08 | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 13 | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Timber Black, Shiny Gold, Crystal Green, Galaxy White | Blue |
| Models | X6525 | - |
| Price | About 70 EUR | - |
Infinix Smart 8 HD
- More powerful and efficient Unisoc T606 chipset
- Modern 12nm manufacturing process
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Slower 10W charging
- Likely basic camera performance
itel Vision 3 Turbo
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially quicker top-ups
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful and efficient Unisoc SC9863A chipset
- Older 28nm manufacturing process
- Likely lower sustained performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut) are missing. The focus here is on usability, and the lack of advanced features like high refresh rates or AMOLED technology is expected. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices relying on basic sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance detail and reduce noise, but the limitations of the hardware will be apparent.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Smart 8 HD’s Unisoc T606 (12nm) utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process than the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). This translates to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. The T606’s CPU configuration – 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 – is also more capable than the Vision 3 Turbo’s 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55. The A75 cores in the Infinix offer a significant boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch times and overall responsiveness. While both are octa-core, the architectural differences are substantial.
Battery Life
The itel Vision 3 Turbo’s 18W charging is a clear advantage over the Infinix Smart 8 HD’s 10W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times, a crucial benefit for users who don’t have access to charging overnight. However, battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. The more efficient Unisoc T606 in the Infinix Smart 8 HD could potentially offset a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering comparable real-world battery life despite the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Smart 8 HD if you need a phone that feels relatively snappy for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light messaging, and you value a chipset built on a more efficient manufacturing process. Buy the itel Vision 3 Turbo if you prioritize faster charging and are willing to trade some processing power for the convenience of 18W wired charging, particularly if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Smart 8 HD be able to handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram without significant lag?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 chipset in the Infinix Smart 8 HD is sufficiently capable of running popular social media apps smoothly. The Cortex-A75 cores provide a performance boost that will minimize lag during scrolling and app switching, offering a more responsive experience than the itel Vision 3 Turbo.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the itel Vision 3 Turbo from 0% using the 18W charger?
While a precise charging time is unavailable, the 18W charging on the itel Vision 3 Turbo will likely take between 2 to 3 hours for a full charge, assuming a typical battery capacity for this price range. This is significantly faster than the Infinix Smart 8 HD’s 10W charging, which could take upwards of 4 hours.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Both the Infinix Smart 8 HD and the itel Vision 3 Turbo should be able to handle less demanding mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers. However, don't expect high frame rates or the ability to play graphically intensive games smoothly. The Infinix Smart 8 HD will likely offer a slightly more stable experience due to its more powerful chipset.
