The Infinix Smart 4 and Nokia 2.4 represent the lower end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting first-time buyers or those needing a reliable secondary device. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an incredibly affordable price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core components to reveal which offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 2.4 emerges as the better choice. While both phones are firmly in the budget category, the Nokia 2.4’s Mediatek Helio P22 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Infinix Smart 4’s quad-core Helio A22, making it more responsive for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2020, September 22. Released 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 165.9 x 76.3 x 8.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 Pie (Go edition) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple | Fjord, Dusk, Charcoal |
| Models | X653, X663 | TA-1277, TA-1275, TA-1274, TA-1270 |
| Price | - | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Smart 4
- Potentially lower price point.
- Functional for basic tasks.
- Large 6.6-inch display.
- Significantly weaker processor.
- Likely slower app loading times.
- Potentially slower charging.
Nokia 2.4
- More powerful octa-core processor.
- Smoother multitasking experience.
- 10W wired charging for faster top-ups.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Camera performance likely similar to Infinix.
- Still an entry-level device with limitations.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are adequate for basic viewing. The lack of higher refresh rates or advanced panel technologies is expected. The Nokia 2.4’s slightly larger screen size (6.5 inches vs. 6.6 inches on the Smart 4) may offer a marginally more immersive experience, but the difference is likely minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, given the focus on cost reduction. Details regarding sensor size and image processing are unavailable. However, it’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Nokia 2.4 is unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality; these low-resolution macro lenses often struggle with detail and clarity. The primary sensor quality will be the determining factor, and without specific details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 2.4’s Mediatek Helio P22 is a significant upgrade over the Infinix Smart 4’s Helio A22. The P22’s octa-core Cortex-A53 CPU, clocked at 2.0 GHz, provides substantially more processing power than the A22’s quad-core configuration, also at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. While both use the same 12nm process, the architectural advantage of eight cores versus four is undeniable. Users who intend to run multiple apps or engage in light gaming will find the Nokia 2.4 far more capable.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the Infinix Smart 4, but the Nokia 2.4’s battery life will be influenced by its 10W wired charging capability. While not fast charging by modern standards, 10W allows for quicker top-ups compared to potentially slower charging on the Infinix Smart 4 if it lacks dedicated charging technology. The efficiency of the Helio P22 chipset in the Nokia 2.4 may also contribute to slightly better battery life under moderate usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Smart 4 if your primary need is absolute affordability and you primarily use your phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light WhatsApp usage. It’s a functional device for those on a very tight budget. Buy the Nokia 2.4 if you prioritize a smoother user experience, even with basic apps, and appreciate the added benefit of 10W charging for quicker top-ups. It’s a better all-rounder for the price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia 2.4 struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
While the Nokia 2.4 is an entry-level device, the Helio P22 chipset is generally capable of running social media apps smoothly. However, expect some loading times and potential lag when switching between multiple apps. It's not designed for intensive social media usage like video editing or live streaming.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 4 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Infinix Smart 4 is a perfectly adequate choice for basic communication. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple messaging apps like WhatsApp. However, if you anticipate using your phone for anything beyond these basic functions, the Nokia 2.4 is a better investment.
❓ Can the Nokia 2.4 handle light gaming, like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
The Nokia 2.4 can handle light gaming, but don't expect a high-performance experience. Games like Candy Crush and Subway Surfers should be playable, but you may encounter occasional frame drops or lag, especially during more demanding sections. More graphically intensive games are likely to be unplayable.
