The Oppo K3 and Infinix S5 represent distinct approaches to the budget and lower-midrange smartphone market. The K3, launched with a focus on performance, features Qualcomm's Snapdragon 710. The S5, on the other hand, aims for affordability with MediaTek's Helio P22. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K3 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 710 chipset provides a noticeably smoother experience for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. While the Infinix S5 offers a lower entry price, the performance gap is substantial enough to justify the K3's cost for anyone prioritizing responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October | 2019, May. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 76 x 9.4 mm (6.35 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 102.1 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 616 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.5", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, 14mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3765 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Black, Nebula Purple, Morning White |
| Models | X652 | CPH1955, PCGM00 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Infinix S5
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks.
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset (speculation).
- Significantly slower performance compared to the K3.
- Less capable camera system.
- Slower charging speeds.
Oppo K3
- Superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 710.
- Faster 20W charging.
- More refined user experience.
- Higher price point.
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life (depending on capacity).
- May not be the best choice for extremely budget-conscious users.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K3's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and brightness. The S5, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more basic LCD. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the design trends of their respective launch windows. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume the K3 offers a more visually pleasing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the K3's higher processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The S5 likely relies on simpler image processing, adequate for casual photography but lacking the refinement of the K3. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes a definitive statement impossible, but the K3's chipset advantage suggests superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K3's Snapdragon 710 (10nm) is a significant upgrade over the Infinix S5's MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The 710 utilizes a Kryo 360 architecture with a dual-cluster configuration (2x2.2 GHz Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Silver), offering superior sustained performance and efficiency compared to the Helio P22's homogenous octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The 10nm process node of the Snapdragon 710 further contributes to better thermal management, reducing throttling during prolonged use. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the K3.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Oppo K3 boasts 20W wired charging, a significant advantage over the S5, which likely features slower charging speeds. This means the K3 can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. While the S5 might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the K3's faster charging mitigates this advantage, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll be sacrificing performance for affordability. Buy the Oppo K3 if you prioritize a smoother user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or frequently use demanding apps. The Snapdragon 710 offers a significant performance boost that justifies the higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P22 in the Infinix S5 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or Instagram?
While the Helio P22 can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag and slower loading times, especially when multitasking. The chipset is designed for basic tasks and isn't optimized for demanding applications.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo K3 capable of playing modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 710 is capable of playing these games at medium to high settings with acceptable frame rates. While it won't deliver the same performance as flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Helio P22.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Oppo K3 with the 20W charger?
With the 20W charger, the Oppo K3 can typically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes, depending on battery capacity. This is considerably faster than the Infinix S5, which likely takes over 2 hours.
❓ Does the Infinix S5 have any features to compensate for its weaker processor?
The Infinix S5 primarily focuses on affordability. It doesn't offer any standout features to compensate for the Helio P22's limitations. Its appeal lies in providing a functional smartphone experience at the lowest possible price point.