The Infinix S5 Pro and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the budget smartphone space, but cater to different priorities. The S5 Pro emphasizes extended battery life, while the Nokia 7.2 aims for a more refined display experience and a generally smoother software experience. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity, the Infinix S5 Pro is the clear winner, boasting an impressive 106-hour endurance rating. However, the Nokia 7.2 counters with a significantly brighter and more color-accurate display, making it a better choice for media consumption and outdoor visibility.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06. Released 2020, March 13 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | X660, X660C, X660B | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 106h
|
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1677:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.5 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 90446 (v7), 117533 (v8)
GeekBench: 4226 (v4.4), 1039 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 3.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (106h endurance)
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent contrast ratio for the price
- Dimmer display (336 nits)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Unspecified camera quality
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 660)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life (69h endurance)
- Slower charging (10W)
- Higher price compared to S5 Pro
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2’s display is the standout feature, achieving a measured peak brightness of 585 nits compared to the Infinix S5 Pro’s 336 nits. This substantial difference makes the Nokia 7.2 far more usable in direct sunlight. While the S5 Pro offers a respectable 1677:1 contrast ratio, the Nokia 7.2’s 1342:1 ratio, combined with the higher brightness, results in a more visually appealing image. Neither phone specifies panel technology, but the Nokia 7.2’s superior brightness suggests a higher-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Nokia’s history with Zeiss optics, the Nokia 7.2 likely benefits from more refined image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit. Focusing on the main sensor’s quality (which is unspecified) is crucial for assessing real-world camera performance.
Performance
The Nokia 7.2 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm), while the Infinix S5 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). Despite the P35’s slightly smaller manufacturing process, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores offer a performance advantage, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. The Snapdragon 660’s architecture (4x2.2 GHz Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Silver) is more efficient than the P35’s (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). This translates to smoother app switching and a more responsive user experience on the Nokia 7.2. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the chipset difference is the defining factor.
Battery Life
The Infinix S5 Pro dominates in battery endurance with a rating of 106 hours, significantly exceeding the Nokia 7.2’s 69 hours. This difference is substantial and directly impacts daily usability. The Nokia 7.2’s 10W wired charging is comparatively slow, while the S5 Pro’s charging speed is not specified, but the longer endurance mitigates the need for rapid charging. The larger battery capacity in the S5 Pro is the primary driver of its superior battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro if you absolutely need a phone that can last through two full days of moderate use, and are willing to compromise on display brightness and processing power. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value a vibrant, easily visible screen, a more efficient chipset, and a cleaner Android experience, even if it means more frequent charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro powerful enough for modern mobile games?
The Helio P35 is an entry-level chipset and will struggle with demanding games at high settings. Expect to play less graphically intensive titles or reduce graphics settings for a smoother experience. The Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 offers a noticeable performance boost for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the Nokia 7.2's display in direct sunlight compared to the Infinix S5 Pro?
The Nokia 7.2's 585 nits of brightness is almost double the 336 nits of the Infinix S5 Pro. This means the Nokia 7.2 will be significantly easier to see outdoors, even on bright days, while the S5 Pro's screen may appear washed out.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
The Nokia 7.2 only supports 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow. A full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. The Infinix S5 Pro's charging speed is unspecified, but the longer battery life may lessen the impact of slower charging.
