The Infinix S5 Pro and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their approach to display technology, processing power, and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and longer battery life, the Infinix S5 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its superior brightness and endurance rating outweigh the Moto G8 Plus’s slightly more efficient chipset. However, users seeking faster charging will find the Moto G8 Plus more convenient.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06. Released 2020, March 13 | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | X660, X660C, X660B | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 106h
| Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1677:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.5 LUFS (Average)
|
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 90446 (v7), 117533 (v8)
GeekBench: 4226 (v4.4), 1039 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 3.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro
- Significantly longer battery life (106h endurance)
- Brighter display for indoor viewing
- Potentially better value for money
- Less efficient chipset (Helio P35)
- No fast charging support (based on provided specs)
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 665)
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Shorter battery life (87h endurance)
- Potentially lower sustained performance
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 581 nits compared to the Infinix S5 Pro’s 336 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility, making the Moto G8 Plus the clear winner for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight. However, the Infinix S5 Pro’s 1677:1 contrast ratio, while nominally similar to the Moto G8 Plus’s 1505:1, may translate to slightly richer blacks. Both displays utilize standard LCD technology; neither features higher refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like AMOLED.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or features. Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both rely on relatively basic camera setups. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography or offer advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Moto G8 Plus’s focus on 'Photo' may indicate a slightly more refined image processing pipeline, but without further information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), built on a more efficient manufacturing process than the Infinix S5 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 665’s Kryo 260 Gold cores operate at 2.0 GHz, potentially offering a slight performance edge over the Helio P35’s 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. However, the architectural differences and the 11nm process node suggest the Snapdragon 665 will likely exhibit better sustained performance under load and improved thermal management. The Helio P35 is adequate for basic tasks, but the Snapdragon 665 is better suited for multitasking and light gaming.
Battery Life
The Infinix S5 Pro’s endurance rating of 106 hours significantly surpasses the Motorola Moto G8 Plus’s 87 hours. This translates to a substantial advantage in real-world battery life, allowing the S5 Pro to comfortably last a full day of moderate to heavy use. While the Moto G8 Plus offers 15W wired charging, a feature absent in the provided specs for the S5 Pro, the difference in battery capacity and overall endurance makes the S5 Pro the more appealing option for users prioritizing longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and need extended battery life for all-day use. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you value faster 15W charging and prefer a slightly more power-efficient chipset, even if it means sacrificing display brightness and overall endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
The Helio P35 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering during intense gameplay. The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus will offer a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much does the 15W charging on the Moto G8 Plus improve charging speed compared to a standard 10W charger?
15W charging on the Moto G8 Plus will noticeably reduce charging times compared to a standard 10W charger. While a precise 0-100% time isn't available, expect a roughly 30-45 minute reduction in full charge time. However, the Infinix S5 Pro's larger battery capacity may still take longer to fully charge even with a faster charger.
❓ Is the camera on either phone suitable for taking clear photos in low-light conditions?
Neither the Infinix S5 Pro nor the Motorola Moto G8 Plus are expected to excel in low-light photography. Both likely utilize basic camera sensors and lack features like optical image stabilization. Expect noisy images and limited detail in dimly lit environments.
