The Infinix S5 Pro (48+40) and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The S5 Pro, with its dual 48MP/40MP camera setup, aimed for camera-centric appeal. The Poco X3 NFC, however, prioritizes performance with a more modern chipset and faster charging, making this a compelling comparison for users seeking the best bang for their buck.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the Infinix S5 Pro’s Helio P35, coupled with significantly faster 33W charging. While the S5 Pro attempts to differentiate with its dual front cameras, the Poco X3 NFC’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 40 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | X660 | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro (48+40)
- Unique dual front camera setup
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speeds (implied)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Much faster Snapdragon 732G processor
- 33W fast charging
- More efficient 8nm chipset
- Camera details are limited in provided data
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar display quality in terms of black levels. However, the Infinix S5 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, making a detailed comparison impossible. The Poco X3 NFC’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the overall system performance allowing for smoother animations and responsiveness. The lack of information on the S5 Pro’s panel type (IPS, AMOLED) and resolution hinders a complete assessment.
Camera Comparison
The Infinix S5 Pro boasts a 48MP main camera alongside a 40MP front camera, aiming for strong selfie capabilities. However, megapixel count isn’t everything. The Poco X3 NFC’s camera specifications are not detailed in the provided data, but Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or presence of OIS on either device, a definitive camera comparison is difficult. The S5 Pro’s dual front camera setup is a unique feature, but its practical benefit is questionable compared to a single, higher-quality front sensor.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) is built on a more efficient process node than the Infinix S5 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 732G features Kryo 470 Gold and Silver cores, offering a more balanced and powerful CPU configuration (2x2.3 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz) compared to the S5 Pro’s (4x2.3 GHz + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Poco X3 NFC. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco X3 NFC’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 62% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Infinix S5 Pro’s charging speed is not specified, implying it’s considerably slower. This faster charging capability gives the Poco X3 NFC a practical advantage, even if the overall battery capacity is similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (48+40) if your primary need is a phone for very basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media, and you prioritize a dual front camera setup for selfies. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and everyday use, and value fast charging and a more modern chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 732G in the Poco X3 NFC capable of playing demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is a capable gaming chipset. It can handle PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process and improved thermal management help prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Infinix S5 Pro's 40MP front camera actually produce better selfies than a standard 16MP or 20MP front camera?
Not necessarily. While a higher megapixel count can capture more detail, the quality of the sensor, lens, and image processing algorithms are more important. The Infinix S5 Pro's dual front camera setup may offer some benefits in specific scenarios, but it doesn't guarantee superior selfie quality compared to a well-optimized single front camera.
❓ How does the Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro perform with multitasking and running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Helio P35 is a relatively basic processor and will struggle with heavy multitasking. Running several apps simultaneously may result in noticeable lag and slowdowns. It's best suited for users who primarily use one app at a time.
❓ Is the NFC functionality on the Poco X3 NFC reliable for mobile payments?
Yes, the NFC functionality on the Poco X3 NFC is generally reliable for mobile payments using services like Google Pay. Xiaomi has a good track record with NFC implementation, and the Poco X3 NFC supports the necessary standards for secure transactions.
