The Infinix S5 Pro and vivo V19 Neo represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The S5 Pro emphasizes camera megapixels, while the V19 Neo leans on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 675 for a smoother overall experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the vivo V19 Neo is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 675, built on an 11nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Infinix S5 Pro’s Helio P35, especially in multitasking and gaming. While the S5 Pro boasts higher camera megapixel counts, the V19 Neo’s optimized chipset delivers a more refined user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, June 13. Released 2020, June 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 40 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Admiral Blue, Crystal White |
| Models | X660 | - |
| Price | - | About 320 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
Infinix S5 Pro (48+40)
- Higher camera megapixel count for detailed photos (in good light)
- Potentially lower price point
- Large display for media consumption
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Slower charging speeds
- Potential for performance throttling under load
vivo V19 Neo
- More efficient and powerful chipset (Snapdragon 675)
- Faster 18W charging
- Smoother overall user experience
- Potentially higher price
- Camera may not have the same megapixel count as the S5 Pro
- May lack certain features found on higher-end devices
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. Without specific display specs, we can infer that the V19 Neo’s Snapdragon 675 ISP likely offers better image signal processing for potentially more accurate colors. The S5 Pro’s focus on camera megapixels doesn’t translate to display quality.
Camera Comparison
The Infinix S5 Pro attempts to win on paper with its 48MP + 40MP camera configuration. However, megapixels aren’t everything. The V19 Neo’s camera system, while likely featuring a lower megapixel count, benefits from the Snapdragon 675’s superior image signal processor (ISP). This ISP handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and color accuracy more effectively. The S5 Pro’s 40MP secondary sensor is likely a depth sensor, adding artificial bokeh effects, while the 48MP main sensor will perform better in good lighting. The V19 Neo’s image processing will likely yield more consistent results across various lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The vivo V19 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) is a clear upgrade over the Infinix S5 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 675 provides better power efficiency and thermal management, resulting in sustained performance. The Snapdragon 675’s Kryo 460 cores – 2x2.0 GHz Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Silver – offer a more balanced architecture than the Helio P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the V19 Neo.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the vivo V19 Neo gains a significant advantage with its 18W wired charging. The Infinix S5 Pro likely supports standard 10W charging, resulting in considerably longer charge times. The Snapdragon 675’s power efficiency further contributes to better battery life on the V19 Neo, offsetting any potential capacity difference. Users who value quick top-ups will strongly prefer the V19 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (48+40) if you prioritize camera versatility and are comfortable with potentially slower performance in demanding applications. Its 48MP + 40MP camera setup caters to users who frequently capture photos and videos, even if image processing isn't top-tier. Buy the vivo V19 Neo if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a chipset known for its efficiency. This phone is ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio P35 is a relatively basic chipset. While PUBG Mobile may be playable at lower settings, expect frame drops and potential lag, especially during intense firefights. The Snapdragon 675 in the V19 Neo offers a significantly smoother gaming experience, allowing for higher settings and more consistent frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the vivo V19 Neo compared to the Infinix S5 Pro?
The V19 Neo’s 18W charging is substantially faster than the S5 Pro’s likely 10W charging. This translates to a significantly reduced time to fully charge the battery. While exact 0-100% times aren’t available, the V19 Neo will likely charge in around 2 hours, while the S5 Pro could take 3+ hours.
❓ Does the higher megapixel count on the Infinix S5 Pro guarantee better image quality?
Not necessarily. Megapixels are only one factor in image quality. The Snapdragon 675 in the V19 Neo has a superior image signal processor (ISP) that handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and color accuracy more effectively. This often results in better overall image quality, even with a lower megapixel count.
