The Nokia 7.2 and Infinix S5 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Nokia 7.2 leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660, known for its efficiency, while the Infinix S5 Pro opts for MediaTek’s Helio P35. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter, more viewable display, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the stronger contender. While the Infinix S5 Pro offers a lower entry price, the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 provides a smoother user experience and better long-term reliability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06. Released 2020, April | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | X660 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | - | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent battery life for basic usage.
- Potentially larger storage options (depending on configuration).
- Helio P35 chipset offers limited performance.
- Display likely lacks brightness and color accuracy.
- Camera performance is likely subpar.
Nokia 7.2
- Snapdragon 660 provides smoother performance.
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- Qualcomm ISP offers better image processing.
- Higher price compared to the Infinix S5 Pro.
- Slow 10W charging.
- May not have expandable storage.
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly more usable display experience. Its measured peak brightness of 585 nits, coupled with a 1342:1 contrast ratio, ensures excellent visibility even in outdoor conditions. While the Infinix S5 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of the Nokia 7.2’s brightness, potentially leading to washed-out visuals in sunlight. The Nokia 7.2’s contrast ratio, though nominal, still indicates a better ability to display deep blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the market positioning, it’s unlikely either phone features a flagship-level camera system. The Infinix S5 Pro’s '16+32' designation likely refers to a combination of main and secondary sensors, but without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The Nokia 7.2, while also lacking detailed specs, benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 660, which generally delivers better image processing and dynamic range compared to MediaTek’s offerings at this price point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) utilizes Kryo 260 cores, offering a more efficient architecture than the MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) found in the Infinix S5 Pro. The Snapdragon 660’s CPU configuration of 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver provides a performance edge over the Helio P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. The Snapdragon 660’s superior GPU will translate to smoother graphics performance in games and applications. The 14nm process of the Snapdragon 660, while larger than the Helio P35’s 12nm, is optimized for power efficiency, potentially mitigating any thermal concerns.
Battery Life
Both the Nokia 7.2 and Infinix S5 Pro share an endurance rating of 69 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 is more power-efficient, potentially allowing it to maintain that endurance rating even with more demanding tasks. Both phones feature 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today’s standards, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a more responsive device capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and benefit from a brighter, more easily visible display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix S5 Pro struggle with multitasking or demanding apps?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio P35 is a relatively low-end chipset. While it can handle basic tasks, you'll likely experience lag and slowdowns when running multiple apps simultaneously or using resource-intensive applications. The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 is significantly better equipped for multitasking.
❓ Is the Nokia 7.2 a good option for mobile gaming?
The Nokia 7.2 is a more suitable option for mobile gaming than the Infinix S5 Pro. The Snapdragon 660’s GPU provides better graphics performance, allowing for smoother gameplay in most popular titles. However, don’t expect to run demanding games at maximum settings; you’ll likely need to lower the graphics quality for optimal performance.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone?
Both phones support 10W charging, which is quite slow. Expect a full charge to take approximately 2.5 to 3.5 hours from 0% to 100%, depending on the charger and usage during charging.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 have a headphone jack?
Yes, the Nokia 7.2 retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature increasingly rare in modern smartphones. The Infinix S5 Pro's inclusion of a headphone jack is not confirmed by the provided data, but is likely given its market segment.
