The Infinix S5 Pro and vivo V17 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The S5 Pro aimed for affordability with a focus on camera megapixels, while the V17 Pro positioned itself as a more refined experience with a more powerful chipset and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more pleasant viewing experience, the vivo V17 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 675 chipset, built on an 11nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Infinix S5 Pro’s Helio P35, despite both phones sharing an identical 107-hour endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2019, September 20. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.7 x 9.8 mm (6.26 x 2.94 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
13 MP, (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Motorized pop-up 8 MP, 17mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Crystal Black, Crystal Sky, Midnight Ocean |
| Models | X660 | 1909, PD1931F_EX, 1910 |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.39 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -94.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 89dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 176791 (v7)
GeekBench: 6629 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Potentially lower price point
- High megapixel front camera (32MP)
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Less powerful Helio P35 chipset
- Likely lower display quality
- Unspecified camera sensor details
vivo V17 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Brighter display (504 nits)
- Faster 18W charging
- Higher price compared to the S5 Pro
- Camera details are limited
- No significant battery capacity advantage
Display Comparison
The vivo V17 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 504 nits, a significant advantage over the unmeasured display of the Infinix S5 Pro. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the higher brightness of the V17 Pro translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. The lack of detailed display specifications for the S5 Pro suggests a lower-quality panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles. This makes the V17 Pro the better choice for media consumption outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but the specifics are lacking for the S5 Pro beyond the '16+32' designation. This likely refers to a 16MP main sensor and a 32MP front-facing camera. The V17 Pro, while also lacking detailed sensor information, benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 675, which generally delivers superior image processing and dynamic range. Without knowing the aperture and sensor size of the S5 Pro’s main camera, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance, but the V17 Pro’s chipset provides a strong foundation for better image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) in the V17 Pro versus the MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) in the S5 Pro. The Snapdragon 675’s Kryo 460 cores, with a 2x2.0 GHz Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Silver configuration, offer a more efficient and powerful architecture than the Helio P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 675 further enhances efficiency, leading to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling during prolonged use. This translates to a smoother experience in demanding applications and games for the V17 Pro.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Infinix S5 Pro and vivo V17 Pro share an identical endurance rating of 107 hours. However, this doesn't tell the whole story. The Snapdragon 675’s superior efficiency means the V17 Pro achieves this endurance with potentially a smaller battery capacity (not specified for either device). Furthermore, the V17 Pro supports 18W wired charging, offering a faster recharge time compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the S5 Pro, given its less premium positioning.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) if you are on a very tight budget and prioritize a high megapixel count for social media sharing, accepting compromises in processing power. Buy the vivo V17 Pro if you value smoother multitasking, a brighter and more viewable display in outdoor conditions, and a more efficient chipset for sustained performance, even if it comes at a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio P35 is a relatively basic chipset. While PUBG Mobile may be playable at lower settings, expect frame drops and potential lag, especially during intense firefights. The Snapdragon 675 in the V17 Pro offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the vivo V17 Pro's 18W charging significantly reduce charging time compared to the Infinix S5 Pro?
While the exact charging speed of the S5 Pro is unknown, 18W charging on the V17 Pro will likely result in a noticeably faster 0-100% charge. Expect around 1.5-2 hours for a full charge on the V17 Pro, while the S5 Pro could take considerably longer.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 675 handle multitasking compared to the Helio P35?
The Snapdragon 675’s more efficient core configuration and larger cache memory allow for smoother multitasking. You’ll experience fewer app reloads and a more responsive user interface when switching between applications on the V17 Pro.
❓ Is the 32MP front camera on the Infinix S5 Pro a significant advantage for selfies?
While a higher megapixel count doesn't automatically equate to better selfies, the 32MP sensor on the S5 Pro allows for more detailed images. However, the image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 675 in the V17 Pro may still result in more pleasing selfies overall, even with a lower megapixel count.
