The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and Oppo F15 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the crucial differences in processing power and charging capabilities to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and faster charging, the Oppo F15 is the better choice. Its Helio P70 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the S5 Pro’s Helio P35, and the 20W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the S5 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2020, January 16. Released 2020, January |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Lightening Black, Unicorn White |
| Models | X660 | CPH2001 |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.55 W/kg (body) |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent camera for social media
- Inferior chipset performance
- Slower charging speeds
- May struggle with demanding apps
Oppo F15
- Faster and more responsive performance
- 20W fast charging for reduced downtime
- More capable GPU for gaming
- Likely a higher price tag
- Camera performance may not be significantly better
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Without specific details on brightness or color gamut, it's difficult to declare a clear winner. However, the focus here is on internal components, and display differences are likely minimal for typical usage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature multiple rear cameras, but the specifics beyond the megapixel counts are limited. The Infinix S5 Pro’s ‘16+32’ designation likely refers to a 16MP main sensor paired with a 32MP secondary sensor (potentially for portrait mode). The Oppo F15’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, it’s hard to assess image quality. It's likely both phones rely heavily on software processing to enhance photos, and the quality will be adequate for social media sharing but won't compete with higher-end devices.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F15’s Mediatek Helio P70 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the Infinix S5 Pro’s Helio P35 (12nm). The P70 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 cores versus the S5 Pro’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the S5 Pro’s cores have a slightly higher clock speed, the A73 architecture in the P70 delivers superior performance per clock cycle. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Oppo F15. The P70 also features a more capable GPU, offering a better gaming experience. The S5 Pro will handle basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both likely fall in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Oppo F15’s 20W wired charging is a major advantage. Oppo claims a 50% charge in 30 minutes, significantly faster than the charging speeds typically found on devices in this price range. The Infinix S5 Pro likely supports standard 10W or 15W charging, resulting in a much longer charge time. This difference in charging speed has a real-world impact, reducing downtime and making the Oppo F15 more convenient for users who rely heavily on their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Oppo F15 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for multitasking, occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 20W charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo F15’s Helio P70 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio P70 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The P70’s GPU is a step up from the P35, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. Expect playable frame rates, but don’t anticipate ultra-high settings.
❓ Is the 32MP secondary camera on the Infinix S5 Pro actually useful, or is it just a marketing gimmick?
The 32MP secondary camera on the S5 Pro is likely used for portrait mode and potentially for higher-resolution selfies. While the megapixel count is high, the image quality will depend heavily on the sensor size and image processing. It's unlikely to offer a dramatic improvement over a well-tuned 12MP or 16MP camera.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Oppo F15 compared to the Infinix S5 Pro?
The Oppo F15’s 20W charging is significantly faster. It can charge the phone to 50% in approximately 30 minutes. The Infinix S5 Pro, with its likely 10W-15W charging, would take well over an hour to reach the same level, potentially closer to two hours for a full charge.
