The Nokia 7.2 and Infinix S5 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Nokia 7.2 leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660, known for its efficiency, while the Infinix S5 Pro opts for MediaTek’s Helio P35. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter, more viewable display, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the stronger contender. While the Infinix S5 Pro offers a lower entry price, the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 provides a smoother user experience and better long-term reliability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | X660 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | - | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent battery life (69h endurance).
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks.
- Helio P35 chipset offers limited performance.
- Display likely inferior to Nokia 7.2 in brightness and contrast.
- Potentially slower software updates.
Nokia 7.2
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 chipset.
- Brighter and higher contrast display for better viewing.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- Higher price compared to Infinix S5 Pro.
- Slow 10W charging.
- Battery life is similar to the Infinix despite the more efficient chipset.
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly more usable display experience. Its measured peak brightness of 585 nits, coupled with a 1342:1 contrast ratio, ensures excellent visibility even in outdoor conditions. While the Infinix S5 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of the Nokia 7.2’s brightness, given the price difference. The Nokia 7.2’s contrast ratio, though nominal, still indicates a better ability to display deep blacks and vibrant colors, enhancing media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely the Nokia 7.2 benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers superior image processing compared to MediaTek’s offerings at this price point. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Nokia 7.2’s overall hardware advantage suggests better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will feature a primary sensor and auxiliary lenses, but the Nokia 7.2 is likely to have more refined software algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) utilizes Kryo 260 cores, offering a more efficient architecture than the MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) found in the Infinix S5 Pro. The Snapdragon 660’s CPU configuration – 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver – provides a performance edge over the Infinix’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon 660’s architecture translates to better sustained performance and smoother multitasking. The 14nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Nokia 7.2 and Infinix S5 Pro share an endurance rating of 69 hours. This suggests similar battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the Nokia 7.2’s more efficient Snapdragon 660 likely contributes to this longevity by consuming less power during typical usage. Both devices are limited to 10W wired charging, meaning relatively slow charging speeds. A full charge will likely take over two hours for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a more responsive device capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and benefit from a brighter, more easily visible display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 660 can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro will struggle with PUBG Mobile, even on the lowest settings.
❓ How significant is the difference in software experience between the two phones?
The Nokia 7.2 benefits from Nokia’s commitment to Android One, offering a clean, bloatware-free experience with guaranteed software updates. The Infinix S5 Pro typically runs a customized version of Android with pre-installed apps and a less consistent update schedule.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed on both phones a major drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is quite slow by today’s standards. Expect a full charge to take over two hours. If fast charging is a priority, neither of these phones is a good choice.
