The Infinix S5 Pro and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best blend of performance, features, and value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 665 chipset, built on an 11nm process, offers a more efficient and capable experience than the Infinix S5 Pro’s Helio P35, despite both phones sharing an 87-hour endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 06 | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.9 x 9 mm (6.40 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, (depth)
QVGA low light camera sensor | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, (wide) | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Quetzal Cyan, Violet | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | X660 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.79 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance (87h)
- May offer unique software features
- Less powerful Helio P35 chipset
- Likely inferior display brightness
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- More efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Brighter display (581 nits)
- Faster 15W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera performance likely similar to Infinix
- No standout features beyond core performance
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly more usable display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 581 nits. While both phones share a 1505:1 contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the Moto G8 Plus translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. The Infinix S5 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Moto G8 Plus’s measured output provides a clear advantage for outdoor users. We can assume the S5 Pro's display is adequate for indoor use, but will likely struggle in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo' cameras, which is unhelpful. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a meaningful comparison. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on similar budget sensors. The absence of information regarding optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone prioritizes low-light photography. The Infinix S5 Pro's '16+32' designation likely refers to a main and secondary sensor combination, but without knowing the secondary sensor's function, its impact is unclear. We can assume the Moto G8 Plus offers a more refined image processing pipeline due to Qualcomm's ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), while the Infinix S5 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). Although the Helio P35 has eight cores, the Snapdragon 665’s Kryo 260 Gold cores offer superior single-core performance, crucial for everyday tasks. The 11nm process of the Snapdragon 665 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer sustained performance under load. The CPU configurations are similar in terms of core count, but the Snapdragon’s architecture provides a performance edge.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix S5 Pro and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an impressive endurance rating of 87 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency could translate to slightly longer real-world usage on the Moto G8 Plus. The Moto G8 Plus also supports 15W wired charging, while the Infinix S5 Pro’s charging speed is unknown. This faster charging capability on the Motorola device provides a convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are willing to accept slightly slower performance in demanding tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you prefer a more responsive user experience, a brighter and more visible display in outdoor conditions, and a chipset known for better sustained performance and efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the Infinix S5 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P35 is a budget chipset and will likely require reduced graphics settings and frame rates to achieve a playable experience in PUBG Mobile. Expect occasional frame drops and potential stuttering, especially during intense firefights. The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus will offer a smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G8 Plus support fast charging beyond the advertised 15W?
While the Moto G8 Plus officially supports 15W charging, it is compatible with Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0. Using a Quick Charge 3.0 compatible charger *may* result in slightly faster charging speeds, but the difference will likely be marginal. The phone will regulate the charging rate to ensure safety and prevent damage.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Infinix S5 Pro and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience, offering a clean and bloatware-free interface. Infinix, on the other hand, typically includes its own custom UI (XOS) with added features and pre-installed apps. This can be a matter of personal preference; some users prefer the customization options of XOS, while others prefer the simplicity of Motorola's approach.
