The Infinix Note 8 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget and mid-range smartphone market. The Note 8 aims for all-day usability and affordability, while the Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw performance, particularly for gaming. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding performance, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Infinix Note 8 offers a compelling value proposition for everyday tasks and users less concerned with top-tier gaming capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, November 04 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 175.3 x 78.8 x 9 mm (6.90 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP
2 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | X692, MZ-Infinix X692 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 8
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset (pending detailed usage)
- Good for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 860
- Faster 33W charging
- Better suited for gaming and demanding apps
- Higher price tag
- Potentially slightly lower battery life due to more powerful processor
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing for the Infinix Note 8. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not specified beyond the contrast ratio, benefits from the processing power of the Snapdragon 860 to handle higher frame rates in supported games and apps. Without knowing the Note 8’s panel type, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or brightness levels, but the X3 Pro’s chipset gives it an advantage in display-intensive tasks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to assume it benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 860, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significant leap over the Infinix Note 8’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860’s Kryo 485 cores – a 1x2.96 GHz Gold, 3x2.42 GHz Gold, and 4x1.78 GHz Silver configuration – offer substantially higher clock speeds and a more efficient manufacturing process compared to the Helio G80’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco X3 Pro. The 7nm process also implies better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Infinix Note 8’s 18W charging. The X3 Pro can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, minimizing downtime. While the Note 8’s battery life may be similar, the slower charging speed is a notable drawback for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 8 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for daily communication, social media, and light multimedia consumption. It’s ideal for users who value battery life and don’t require intensive gaming performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 860 provides a substantial performance boost, making it suitable for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is a relatively efficient chip, and the Poco X3 Pro includes thermal management features. While it may get warm, it's unlikely to overheat severely and cause significant performance throttling, especially compared to older or less-efficient chipsets. However, sustained peak performance will inevitably generate heat.
❓ Is the Helio G80 in the Infinix Note 8 sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G80 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a smooth experience. Expect compromises in visual fidelity compared to the Poco X3 Pro, which can handle PUBG Mobile at higher settings thanks to the Snapdragon 860.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support fast storage standards like UFS 3.1?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Poco X3 Pro typically utilizes UFS 2.1 storage. This is still a fast storage standard, contributing to quick app loading times, but it's not the latest UFS 3.1 found in some higher-end devices.
❓ How does the 12nm process of the Helio G80 affect battery life compared to the 7nm process of the Snapdragon 860?
A smaller process node (7nm vs 12nm) generally translates to better power efficiency. The Snapdragon 860’s 7nm process allows it to deliver more performance per watt, potentially leading to longer battery life *despite* being a more powerful chip. However, the actual battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization.
