The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and Infinix Note 8 represent compelling options at different price points. The A52s 5G, with its Snapdragon 778G chipset, aims for a balance of performance and 5G connectivity, while the Note 8 focuses on delivering essential features at an even more accessible price, powered by the MediaTek Helio G80. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers significantly faster performance and better efficiency, complemented by a brighter display and a more refined camera experience. While the Infinix Note 8 provides excellent value, the A52s 5G’s overall capabilities justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, November 04 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 175.3 x 78.8 x 9 mm (6.90 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 7.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP
2 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | X692, MZ-Infinix X692 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 200 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 8
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price point
- May lack a headphone jack (market dependent)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower processor (Helio G80)
- Less vibrant display
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Infinix Note 8’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Note 8’s panel specifications are not provided, the A52s 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The A52s 5G’s display is likely to offer better color accuracy and viewing angles, enhancing media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined. The A52s 5G likely benefits from better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Note 8’s camera system, while adequate for casual use, will likely struggle in challenging lighting conditions. It's important to note that the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Note 8 is unlikely to provide a significant benefit due to its limited resolution and sensor size.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), while the Infinix Note 8 is equipped with the MediaTek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 778G’s 6nm process node is more efficient, leading to lower heat generation and sustained performance. Architecturally, the Snapdragon 778G features a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, significantly outperforming the Note 8’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This results in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is considerably faster than the Infinix Note 8’s 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency may contribute to slightly longer real-world battery life for the A52s 5G despite potentially having a similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 8 if you prioritize affordability above all else and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. You’ll appreciate its lower price point. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you demand smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a more capable camera system for capturing higher-quality photos and videos, and future-proof 5G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficiency. While it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process node and Samsung’s thermal management system are generally effective at preventing significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. The Helio G80 in the Note 8 is more prone to throttling under similar conditions.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Infinix Note 8 slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 25W or even 33W charging found on many competing devices, including the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G. Expect a longer 0-100% charge time with the Note 8, potentially taking over 2 hours.
❓ Will the Infinix Note 8 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Infinix Note 8 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Helio G80 is not as powerful as the Snapdragon 778G, so expect some stuttering or lag during intense gameplay. The A52s 5G will provide a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G supports carrier aggregation, allowing the A52s 5G to combine multiple 5G channels for faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
