Oppo Reno 5G vs. Infinix Note 8: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing with 5G, the Oppo Reno 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Infinix Note 8 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and a large screen over raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 8 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, November 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 175.3 x 78.8 x 9 mm (6.90 x 3.10 x 0.35 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~258 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 7.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP 2 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | X692, MZ-Infinix X692 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 880 EUR |
Infinix Note 8
- Longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- More affordable price point
- Large display ideal for media consumption
- Significantly slower performance
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Less advanced camera processing
Oppo Reno 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 855
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Better camera image processing
- Shorter battery life under heavy load
- Higher price compared to the Note 8
- Potential for throttling under sustained workloads (though mitigated by 7nm process)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data unavailable for Note 8 panel type), the focus here is on performance. The Reno 5G’s display benefits from the Snapdragon 855’s superior image signal processor, potentially leading to more accurate color reproduction. The Note 8’s larger screen size (assumed, based on typical Note series positioning) is advantageous for media consumption, but lacks the processing power to fully leverage high-refresh-rate content if it were supported. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segments.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the Snapdragon 855’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Reno 5G provides a significant advantage in image processing. It can handle more complex algorithms for noise reduction, dynamic range optimization, and detail enhancement. The Note 8’s Helio G80 ISP is less capable, resulting in potentially softer images and less effective low-light performance. The Reno 5G likely benefits from better video recording capabilities as well, supporting higher resolutions and frame rates. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Reno 5G, a common feature in phones with Snapdragon 855, would further enhance image and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 8’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores, with a peak clock speed of 2.84 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The Helio G80, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon 855 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 8’s 18W charging is slower than the Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging. However, the Helio G80’s lower power consumption means the Note 8 will likely achieve a longer battery life on a single charge. While the Reno 5G’s 20W charging offers a quicker top-up, the more power-hungry Snapdragon 855 will drain the battery faster during intensive use. The actual 0-100% charge times will depend on battery capacity (data unavailable for both devices), but the Note 8 will likely offer more hours of usage per charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 8 if you need a large-screen device for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming, and your budget is a primary concern. You'll benefit from its long battery life and affordability. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the benefits of 5G connectivity, and are willing to spend a bit more for a smoother, more responsive experience.