The Infinix Note 50x and Oppo A79 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal, primarily through their chipset choices and charging capabilities. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best blend of performance, features, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Infinix Note 50x emerges as the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Oppo A79’s Dimensity 6020, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Oppo A79 remains a viable option for those seeking a balanced experience with a focus on everyday usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, October 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.4 x 8.0 mm or 8.2 mm | 165.6 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195.4 g or 198.9 g (6.88 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 560 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
10W reverse wired
Bypass Charging | 33W wired, 51% in 30 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gray, Enchanted Purple, Sea Breeze Green, Sunset Spice Pink | Mystery Black, Glowing Green, Dazzling Purple |
| Models | X6857B | CPH2553, CPH2557 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | ₹ 17,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Note 50x
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging with 10W reverse charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Display specifications are unknown
- Infinix’s software update track record is less consistent than Oppo’s
Oppo A79
- Potentially more refined software experience (based on Oppo’s history)
- Generally good battery life with 33W charging
- Likely competitive pricing
- Less powerful Dimensity 6020 chipset
- Slower charging speed compared to the Infinix Note 50x
- No reverse charging capability
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are missing for both devices. However, given the price points, we can anticipate both utilizing LCD panels. The key differentiator will likely be resolution and brightness. Oppo historically focuses on color science, so the A79 might offer more vibrant colors out of the box. The Note 50x, with its more powerful chipset, *could* support higher refresh rates if Infinix chooses to implement it, offering a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset advantage of the Infinix Note 50x suggests potentially better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. This could lead to improved dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. We can assume both phones will feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and depth sensor, but the sensor sizes and lens apertures will be crucial. A larger sensor with a wider aperture will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The Note 50x’s more powerful processor could also enable more advanced computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 50x boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, a 4nm processor with an octa-core configuration featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, paired with four efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Oppo A79’s Dimensity 6020, a 7nm chip with two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate translates to superior power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The A78 cores in the Note 50x also provide a substantial architectural advantage over the A76 cores in the A79, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. This will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 50x features 45W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Oppo A79’s 33W charging. Oppo claims 51% charge in 30 minutes, while the 45W charging on the Note 50x will likely achieve a higher percentage in the same timeframe. The Note 50x also includes 10W reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices, a feature absent on the A79. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Dimensity 7300 Ultimate in the Note 50x should contribute to longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the A79.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50x if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and benefit from significantly faster 45W charging. This is the choice for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Oppo A79 if you prefer a more streamlined experience focused on essential tasks, and prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (based on Oppo’s historical software support) over peak performance. It’s ideal for everyday users who don’t push their phones to the limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate in the Infinix Note 50x handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate is a capable chipset that should handle Genshin Impact and other demanding games at medium to high settings. The 4nm process and powerful Cortex-A78 cores will help maintain stable frame rates and prevent excessive throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, optimal performance will depend on the phone’s thermal design.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Infinix and Oppo, and which one offers better long-term support?
Oppo’s ColorOS is generally considered more polished and feature-rich than Infinix’s XOS. Oppo has a better track record of providing consistent software updates and security patches. While Infinix has improved its software support in recent years, it still lags behind Oppo in terms of update frequency and longevity. Users prioritizing long-term software support should lean towards the Oppo A79.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A79 sufficient for most users, or is the 45W on the Infinix Note 50x a necessity?
33W charging is adequate for many users, providing a reasonable top-up during a short break. However, the 45W charging on the Infinix Note 50x is noticeably faster, significantly reducing the time spent tethered to a charger. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly replenish your battery, the 45W charging is a worthwhile advantage.
