The Infinix Note 50s and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Note 50s arrives with MediaTek’s newer Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Poco X5 Pro leverages the established Snapdragon 778G 5G. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best blend of performance, features, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Infinix Note 50s emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 778G, and the 45W charging is significantly quicker than the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W, despite the latter's slightly better endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 18 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 24 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.5 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 60 min
10W reverse wired
Bypass Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Marine Blue, Titanium Grey, Ruby Red | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X6870 | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | $ 552.51 / ₹ 15,999 | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 50s
- More powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset
- Faster charging with 45W wired
- Includes 10W reverse wired and bypass charging
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Brighter display with 912 nits peak brightness
- Proven Snapdragon 778G 5G performance
- Excellent battery endurance (113h)
- Slower charging speed (45 minutes to 100%)
- Lacks reverse charging and bypass charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 912 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Infinix Note 50s’ display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls slightly behind in peak brightness given the Poco’s strong showing. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. The absence of refresh rate data for the Note 50s is a key omission, but the Poco X5 Pro’s display is a clear strength for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship. The Poco X5 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its strong image processing. However, the Note 50s’ newer chipset may incorporate advancements in image processing algorithms. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable image quality for social media and casual photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 50s’ Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 7300 Ultimate’s CPU configuration – 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a higher peak clock speed on its prime cores compared to the Poco’s 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate also translates to improved power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load, giving it an edge in gaming and demanding applications. The Poco X5 Pro relies on a proven chipset, but the Note 50s has a clear architectural advantage.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Poco X5 Pro supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4, reaching 100% in 45 minutes. The Infinix Note 50s, while offering 45W wired charging, claims a full charge in 60 minutes. The Note 50s also includes 10W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent in the Poco X5 Pro. While the Poco charges faster, the Note 50s offers more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50s if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking, and if rapid charging is a priority. The Dimensity 7300 Ultimate provides a future-proofed experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you prefer a phone with a proven track record, a slightly brighter display (912 nits), and a longer-lasting battery, even if it charges slower. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate in the Infinix Note 50s get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7300 Ultimate’s 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 778G. While heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the Note 50s should experience less throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods, assuming adequate cooling solutions are implemented within the device.
❓ What is 'bypass charging' on the Infinix Note 50s and how does it benefit users?
Bypass charging allows you to power the phone directly from the charger, bypassing the battery. This reduces heat generation and battery wear when gaming or performing other demanding tasks while plugged in. It's a useful feature for users who frequently game or stream for extended periods.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro still capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset and can run Genshin Impact, albeit likely at medium to high settings rather than the highest possible settings. Expect stable frame rates, but potentially with some graphical compromises to maintain performance.
❓ Does the Poco X5 Pro support fast charging with standard USB-PD chargers?
Yes, the Poco X5 Pro supports Power Delivery (PD) 3.0, meaning it can be fast-charged with compatible USB-PD chargers. However, to achieve the maximum 67W charging speed, a charger specifically supporting the Poco’s charging protocol is recommended.
