Infinix Note 50s vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the Infinix Note 50s is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate offers a noticeable step up in processing power. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery life and offers a more polished software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50s | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 18 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 24 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.5 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 60 min 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Marine Blue, Titanium Grey, Ruby Red | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | X6870 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 552.51 / ₹ 15,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Infinix Note 50s
- More powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultimate chipset
- Faster charging capabilities (45W)
- Reverse wired charging support
- Battery life likely inferior to Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor use where the Infinix Note 50s’s display brightness is not specified. While the Note 50s’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage provides a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified for either device, making brightness the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The Infinix Note 50s’s camera setup is also not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, it’s impossible to determine a clear winner. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The Infinix Note 50s’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Note 50s’s CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) also features a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), suggesting better single-core performance. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an 80-hour endurance rating. While the Infinix Note 50s’s battery capacity is not specified, its 45W charging is slower than the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, which can reach 50% in just 15 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and longer battery life make it the more convenient option for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The Note 50s does offer 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 40 Neo, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50s if you need a phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset and faster charging will keep you productive. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone with excellent battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more streamlined user experience, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.