Infinix Note 50s vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the Infinix Note 50s emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 Ultimate offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 45W charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W. However, the Pixel 7a’s superior camera and software experience make it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50s | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 18 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 24 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.5 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 100% in 60 min 10W reverse wired Bypass Charging | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Marine Blue, Titanium Grey, Ruby Red | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | X6870 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | $ 552.51 / ₹ 15,999 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Infinix Note 50s
- Faster 45W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate offers strong performance.
- Reverse wired charging provides added versatility.
- Camera performance is likely inferior to the Pixel 7a.
- Software updates may be less frequent and slower.
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing.
- Clean and consistently updated Android software.
- Strong brand reputation and ecosystem integration.
- Slower 18W charging is a significant drawback.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Note 50s’ display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s display technology is likely OLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy compared to the Note 50s, which may utilize an LCD panel. The Pixel 7a’s smaller size (assumed, based on Pixel A-series history) may also appeal to users preferring a more compact device.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms to deliver consistently excellent results. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s camera is expected to excel in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Note 50s’ camera performance is less predictable without sensor size and aperture information, but it will likely rely more on hardware capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from Google’s video stabilization and processing techniques. We can assume the Pixel 7a will have a more refined and consistent camera experience overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, designed for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Infinix Note 50s counters with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate (4nm), utilizing four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz and four A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate should offer better power efficiency and thermal management than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The Note 50s’ architecture suggests a focus on multi-core performance, while the Pixel 7a prioritizes single-core speed. The Pixel 7a benefits from Google’s software optimization, but the Note 50s’ raw processing power is likely to be higher.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Infinix Note 50s compensates with significantly faster charging – 45W wired, achieving 100% in 60 minutes, compared to the Pixel 7a’s 18W wired charging. The Note 50s also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a. While the Pixel 7a’s battery endurance is respectable, the Note 50s’ rapid charging capability provides a significant convenience advantage, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature not present on the Note 50s.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50s if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or heavy multitasking, and value fast charging above all else. You’ll also appreciate the lower price point. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean and consistently updated software experience, and are willing to trade some performance and charging speed for those benefits. It’s ideal for users who heavily rely on Google’s ecosystem.