Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs. vivo X100 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Mediatek Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and value, the vivo X100 Pro emerges as the winner. Its superior display brightness, more powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset, and longer active use battery score justify the higher price tag. However, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ offers compelling features like 100W wired *and* wireless MagCharge at a significantly lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50 Pro+ | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless MagCharge 10W reverse wired 7.5w reverse wireless Bypass Charging | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Grey, Enchanted Purple, Racing Edition | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | X6856 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- Faster wireless charging with MagCharge
- More versatile reverse charging options
- Significantly lower price point
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Less powerful chipset
- Dimmer display
vivo X100 Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9300
- Brighter and likely more advanced display
- Longer battery life in active use
- Higher price
- Less versatile charging options
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1472 nits compared to the Infinix Note 50 Pro+'s 1043 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the X100 Pro’s brighter panel will draw more power. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type (LTPO), but the X100 Pro’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced display technology geared towards content creators and outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates that the vivo X100 Pro has a camera system, lacking specific sensor details. However, vivo’s flagship X-series is renowned for its camera prowess, typically featuring large sensors and advanced image processing. The absence of camera specs for the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume the X100 Pro will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience, particularly in low-light conditions. The X100 Pro’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined, offering better dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the vivo X100 Pro features the flagship Dimensity 9300. The 9300’s CPU configuration – with Cortex-X4 cores – represents a substantial architectural leap over the 8350 Ultimate’s Cortex-A715 cores, promising faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The X100 Pro’s CPU clock speeds (3.25 GHz Cortex-X4) are also higher than the Note 50 Pro+'s (3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, but with fewer of the higher-performing cores). While both are built on a 4nm process, the 9300’s newer architecture will likely result in better sustained performance and potentially improved thermal management.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro delivers a longer active use battery score of 13:53h compared to the Infinix Note 50 Pro+'s 11:43h. While the Infinix offers both 100W wired and 50W MagCharge wireless charging, reaching 100% in 32 minutes, the X100 Pro charges to 50% in just 14 minutes with its 100W wired charging. The Infinix also includes 50W wireless, 10W reverse wired, and 7.5W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The X100 Pro’s bypass charging feature, while not detailed, suggests optimized charging behavior to minimize battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ if you need exceptional fast charging – both wired and wireless – and prioritize value for money. It’s ideal for users who frequently consume media and need a phone that can last a full day with heavy use. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and prioritize camera quality above all else.