Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing battery life, charging speed, and raw performance, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 11:43h active use score and 100W charging significantly outperform the S23 FE. However, the S23 FE’s more polished software and established camera system appeal to a different audience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50 Pro+ | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - InternationalOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Xclipse 920 - InternationalAdreno 730 - USA |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless MagCharge 10W reverse wired 7.5w reverse wireless Bypass Charging | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Grey, Enchanted Purple, Racing Edition | Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine |
| Models | X6856 | SM-S711B, SM-S711B/DS, SM-S711U1, SM-S711U, SM-S711W, SM-S7110, SM-S711N |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 219.95 / C$ 327.90 / £ 248.99 / € 272.00 / ₹ 34,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.76 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- Superior battery life (11:43h active use)
- Potentially more consistent performance with Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
- Less established brand reputation
- Camera system likely less refined than Samsung’s
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Well-regarded camera system and image processing
- Strong brand recognition and software support
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 variant offers competitive performance (USA)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Shorter battery life (8:28h active use)
- Exynos 2200 variant may experience thermal throttling (International)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ subtly. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 1043 nits, slightly exceeding the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s 985 nits. While the difference isn’t massive, it translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but the brightness advantage favors the Infinix for outdoor use. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests a less dynamic refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life during less demanding tasks.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications, making a direct comparison challenging. However, Samsung’s Galaxy S23 FE benefits from the brand’s extensive image processing expertise and a generally well-regarded camera system. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for either device necessitates caution. It’s reasonable to assume the S23 FE will offer a more refined and consistent camera experience, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for potentially less advanced hardware.
Performance
The chipset choice is the defining performance differentiator. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, built on a 4nm process, featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A715 prime core at 3.35 GHz. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE comes in two variants: an Exynos 2200 (International) and a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (USA), both also on 4nm. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a slight CPU clock speed advantage (3.00 GHz vs 2.8 GHz on the Exynos), the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate’s architecture and core configuration appear optimized for sustained performance. The Exynos 2200 has historically faced thermal throttling concerns, potentially limiting its peak performance during extended gaming sessions. The Infinix’s Dimensity chip is likely to offer more consistent performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the Infinix Note 50 Pro+. Its active use score of 11:43h significantly surpasses the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s 8:28h. This difference is compounded by the charging capabilities. The Infinix supports 100W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 32 minutes, alongside 50W MagCharge wireless and reverse charging options. The S23 FE’s 25W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%, feels comparatively slow. The Infinix’s faster charging and longer battery life make it ideal for users who demand all-day power and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ if you need exceptional battery endurance, blazing-fast charging, and maximum performance for demanding tasks like gaming. You’ll benefit from a device that keeps up with your active lifestyle. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE if you prefer a more refined software experience, a well-regarded camera system, and the peace of mind that comes with a globally recognized brand, even if it means sacrificing some battery and charging convenience.