Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and fast charging, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 100W wired and 50W MagCharge wireless charging, coupled with a strong processor, offer a compelling package. However, the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s superior display and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset make it the clear choice for demanding users and photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50 Pro+ | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless MagCharge 10W reverse wired 7.5w reverse wireless Bypass Charging | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Grey, Enchanted Purple, Racing Edition | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | X6856 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- Significantly lower price point
- Faster wireless charging (50W MagCharge)
- Excellent battery life with 11:43h active use
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Lower peak display brightness
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Advanced camera system (assumed)
- Significantly higher price
- Slower wireless charging compared to Infinix
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1318 nits compared to the Infinix Note 50 Pro+'s 1043 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays utilize a 4nm process for their respective chipsets, the Oppo’s likely benefits from more advanced panel technology and calibration, resulting in a superior viewing experience. The Find X6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior OLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+’s display is still very good, but falls short of the flagship experience offered by Oppo.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Oppo Find X6 Pro highlights its focus on photography and videography, though specific sensor details are missing. Given Oppo’s history, it’s safe to assume a multi-camera system with a large primary sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+’s camera capabilities are less emphasized in the provided data. While it likely offers a competent camera experience, it won’t match the image quality and versatility of the Oppo Find X6 Pro, particularly in low-light conditions. The Oppo’s image processing will likely prioritize color accuracy and dynamic range, while the Infinix may lean towards more saturated, social media-friendly images.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Oppo Find X6 Pro represents a clear performance advantage over the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate in the Infinix Note 50 Pro+. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a substantial boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. While the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate’s octa-core configuration is capable, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture and 4nm fabrication process offer superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Oppo’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, providing faster data access.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 100W wired charging, but the Oppo Find X6 Pro charges slightly faster, reaching 45% in 10 minutes and 100% in 30 minutes, compared to the Infinix Note 50 Pro+'s 32 minutes for a full charge. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ uniquely offers 50W MagCharge wireless charging and 7.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Oppo. While the Oppo’s endurance rating of 114h is similar to the Infinix’s 11:43h active use score, the faster wired charging and potentially more efficient chipset of the Oppo give it an edge in real-world usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ if you need a phone that charges incredibly fast, offers solid gaming performance, and doesn’t break the bank. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life and quick top-ups. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prefer a premium display, top-tier camera capabilities, and the absolute best performance available in an Android smartphone, and are willing to pay a significant premium for it.