Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more refined experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a performance edge, and the 125W charging is noticeably faster. However, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ delivers exceptional value with its 100W wired and 50W MagCharge wireless charging, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 50 Pro+ | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 20 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2304Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 32 min 50W wireless MagCharge 10W reverse wired 7.5w reverse wireless Bypass Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Grey, Enchanted Purple, Racing Edition | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | X6856 | - |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 100W wired charging
- Convenient 50W MagCharge wireless charging
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Dimensity 8350 Ultimate processor
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Camera specifications are unknown and potentially less advanced
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Ultra-fast 125W wired charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Potentially better display quality
- Higher price point
- Lacks MagCharge wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both devices boast impressive displays, with the Motorola Edge 40 Pro achieving a measured peak brightness of 1050 nits, marginally exceeding the Infinix Note 50 Pro+'s 1043 nits. While the difference is minimal, the Motorola’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but both are likely high refresh rate OLED panels. The real-world impact is subtle, but the Motorola’s display may offer a slightly more vibrant and immersive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera specifics. Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack details on sensor size, megapixel count, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Given the Motorola’s flagship positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and advanced image processing. The Infinix, while likely capable, will likely prioritize value over cutting-edge camera technology. Without further details, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the Motorola likely holds an advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship processor built for sustained performance, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate (4nm), which, while powerful, is positioned a tier below. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture, with its more advanced core configuration (1x Cortex-X3, 2x Cortex-A715, 2x Cortex-A710, 3x Cortex-A510) compared to the Dimensity’s (1x Cortex-A715, 3x Cortex-A715, 4x Cortex-A510), translates to better multi-core performance and improved efficiency. This means the Motorola will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and less thermal throttling.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro boasts a 125W wired charging capability, reaching 50% charge in just 6 minutes and 100% in 23 minutes. The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ isn’t far behind with 100W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 32 minutes. However, the Infinix distinguishes itself with 50W MagCharge wireless charging, a feature absent on the Motorola. While the Motorola’s endurance rating of 117 hours is provided, the Infinix’s active use battery score of 11:43h provides a more practical measure. The Infinix’s MagCharge offers a unique convenience, while the Motorola prioritizes sheer charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ if you need exceptional battery life with incredibly fast charging, including convenient wireless MagCharge, and prioritize value for money. You'll benefit from a capable processor for everyday tasks and gaming without breaking the bank. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro if you prefer a flagship-level processor for demanding applications, smoother multitasking, and faster overall performance, and are willing to pay a premium for that experience.