Poco X6 Pro vs. Infinix Note 40: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and display quality, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and 1148 nit display offer a significantly smoother and more immersive experience. However, the Infinix Note 40’s MagCharge wireless charging and faster overall charging cycle make it a strong contender for those valuing convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 40 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 18 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.5 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4 3rd unspecified camera | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min 20W wireless MagCharge Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Gold, Obsidian Black, Racing Edition | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | X6853 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Note 40
- Convenient 20W MagCharge wireless charging
- Versatile reverse wired and wireless charging
- Competitive 45W wired charging speed
- Less powerful Helio G99 Ultimate chipset
- Display brightness likely lower than Poco X6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Bright 1148 nit display for excellent visibility
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Infinix Note 40’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Poco’s brightness advantage is substantial. The X6 Pro’s panel likely benefits from its higher price point, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the X6 Pro’s superior brightness will be more impactful for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Infinix Note 40 are missing, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s camera system is likely to offer superior image quality due to its more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 8300 Ultra. The X6 Pro’s camera is capable of both high-quality photo and video capture, though specific sensor sizes and apertures are needed for a complete assessment. It’s reasonable to assume the X6 Pro will excel in low-light conditions and offer more sophisticated image processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 40’s Helio G99 Ultimate. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a significant performance boost over the Note 40’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Note 40 is adequate for daily tasks, the X6 Pro is designed for demanding users and gamers.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro delivers an impressive 11:46h of active use, demonstrating strong battery life despite its powerful processor. The Infinix Note 40’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 45W wired charging (50% in 26 minutes) is competitive. However, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging (100% in 45 minutes) is faster. The Note 40’s standout feature is its 20W MagCharge wireless charging, offering a convenient alternative to wired charging. The inclusion of reverse wired and wireless charging on the Note 40 further enhances its versatility, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 40 if you need a phone with versatile charging options – particularly wireless MagCharge – and prioritize convenience over absolute performance. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day and appreciate the flexibility of reverse wireless charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone that excels in gaming, demanding applications, and media consumption, and are willing to trade wireless charging for a more powerful processor and brighter display.