Infinix Note 40 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a refined experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 offers a slight performance edge and the measured 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance. However, gamers on a tight budget will find the Infinix Note 40’s aggressive charging and gaming-focused chipset appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 40 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 18 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 19 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.5 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4 3rd unspecified camera | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min 20W wireless MagCharge Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Gold, Obsidian Black, Racing Edition | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | X6853 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Infinix Note 40
- Faster Wireless Charging (20W MagCharge)
- Aggressive Price Point
- Reverse Wired and Wireless Charging
- Less Powerful Processor
- Limited Display Information
- Potentially Lower Battery Life
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter Display (1073 nits)
- Superior Battery Life (10:28h active use)
- More Powerful Processor (Dimensity 7030)
- No Wireless Charging
- Higher Price
- Slightly Slower 0-50% Charge Time
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Infinix Note 40’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its more modern manufacturing process, contributing to its superior visibility. The lack of detailed display specs for the Note 40 makes a direct comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate impossible, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Infinix Note 40, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to offer a more refined experience. The Edge 40 Neo’s image processing benefits from the Dimensity 7030’s ISP, potentially delivering better dynamic range and noise reduction. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, the Edge 40 Neo’s overall camera performance is expected to be superior due to its more powerful processor and potentially larger sensor size (details not provided for Note 40).
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) offers a performance advantage over the Infinix Note 40’s Helio G99 Ultimate. The Dimensity 7030 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the Note 40’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the 6nm process node, translates to better multi-core performance and improved power efficiency. While both chips feature Cortex-A55 efficiency cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, the Dimensity 7030’s superior core architecture and process node will result in smoother multitasking and more responsive app loading. The Note 40 will likely perform well in less demanding tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo has the edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. While the Infinix Note 40’s battery capacity is not specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80h suggests excellent power management. The Note 40 compensates with faster charging – 45W wired (50% in 26 minutes) and 20W wireless MagCharge – compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired (50% in 15 minutes). The Edge 40 Neo’s faster 0-50% charge time is significant, but the Note 40’s wireless charging capability and reverse charging options offer added convenience. The Edge 40 Neo’s longer battery life is a key advantage for users who prioritize all-day usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 40 if you need blazing-fast charging (45W wired, 20W wireless MagCharge) and prioritize gaming on a budget. Its Helio G99 Ultimate is optimized for sustained performance in mobile titles. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more balanced smartphone experience with excellent battery life (10:28h active use), a brighter display (1073 nits), and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks.