Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Infinix Note 12: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and future-proofs connectivity. The significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the identical battery endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.5 g (6.49 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jewel Blue, Force Black, Sunset Golden | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X663, X663C, X663D | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Reliable MediaTek chipset for basic tasks
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 695
- Larger fabrication process (12nm) leads to lower efficiency
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Slightly higher price
- Camera performance likely not a standout feature
- Similar battery endurance to the Infinix Note 12 despite faster charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s positioning, it’s likely to offer a slightly more refined display experience, potentially with better outdoor visibility. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery conservation over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. The absence of information suggests neither device prioritizes exceptional camera performance. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco X4 Pro 5G, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), might offer slightly better image quality and video stabilization. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process compared to the Infinix Note 12’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm). This translates to improved power efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Helio G88’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s architecture is more optimized for demanding tasks. The 6nm process also means less heat generation, potentially reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Note 12 and Poco X4 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a significant advantage, achieving 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. The Infinix Note 12’s 33W charging is considerably slower, making the Poco X4 Pro 5G far more convenient for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 if your priority is a slightly lower upfront cost and you primarily engage in light tasks like social media and basic communication. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, 5G connectivity, and significantly faster charging speeds – all for a modest price premium.