Infinix Note 12 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. Its superior display brightness, more refined camera system, and established software support outweigh the Infinix Note 12’s faster charging and lower price. However, gamers on a tight budget will find the Note 12 a compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.5 g (6.49 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jewel Blue, Force Black, Sunset Golden | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | X663, X663C, X663D | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12
- Faster 33W charging
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better gaming performance for the price
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- Less refined camera system
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- More powerful and efficient processor
- Superior camera system
- Samsung’s software support and ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits, compared to the Infinix Note 12’s unspecified brightness. This makes the A53 far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the A53’s higher peak brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a superior viewing experience. The Note 12’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered. The A53’s larger display size also contributes to a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung’s image processing algorithms and likely larger main sensor (typical for the A-series) provide an advantage. The Note 12’s camera system is likely focused on providing acceptable results at a lower price point. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Note 12 is a common cost-cutting measure, offering limited practical benefit compared to a dedicated, higher-resolution sensor. The A53’s camera system is more likely to offer features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and smoother videos.
Performance
The Exynos 1280 (5nm) in the Galaxy A53 5G represents a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency over the MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm) found in the Infinix Note 12. The A53’s CPU features 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Note 12 has 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also translates to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Note 12 is adequate for everyday tasks, the A53 5G offers a smoother and more responsive experience, particularly in demanding games and multitasking scenarios.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Note 12 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Note 12 supports 33W wired charging, while the A53 5G is limited to 25W. This means the Note 12 will likely charge from 0-100% faster, offering a convenience advantage. Despite the slower charging, the A53’s optimized power efficiency from the Exynos 1280 and 5nm process can offset the difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 if you need a phone primarily for gaming and fast charging is a top priority, and you're comfortable with a less polished software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a more versatile camera system, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software updates and brand reputation.