Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G vs. Infinix Note 12: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 Max chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Infinix Note 12 provides a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users who don't require top-tier performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.5 g (6.49 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | RGB notification lights around the camera island | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jewel Blue, Force Black, Sunset Golden | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | X663, X663C, X663D | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 400 EUR |
Infinix Note 12
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely inferior camera quality
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Superior performance with Dimensity 1200 Max
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Likely better camera system with OIS
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on usage)
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Infinix Note 12, it's likely to feature a standard LCD panel. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G, positioned higher in the market, likely boasts a superior AMOLED display with vibrant colors and deeper blacks. The Reno7 Pro's panel likely supports a higher refresh rate than the Note 12, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. Bezels are expected to be slimmer on the Reno7 Pro, enhancing the immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Infinix Note 12, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Reno7 Pro 5G, being a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and improved low-light performance. The Reno7 Pro’s image processing algorithms are also likely more sophisticated, resulting in better dynamic range and color accuracy. While both phones may include multiple lenses, the Reno7 Pro’s focus on image quality will likely be more pronounced.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max, built on a 6nm process, significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 12’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm). The Dimensity 1200 Max’s octa-core CPU clocked at 3.0 GHz provides a substantial boost in processing power compared to the Note 12’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The Reno7 Pro likely utilizes faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance. The Helio G88 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 12’s 33W charging is respectable, but the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G’s 65W charging is a game-changer. The Reno7 Pro can reach 100% charge in just 31 minutes, minimizing downtime. While the Note 12’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno7 Pro’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Reno7 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices – a feature absent on the Note 12.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks, prioritize battery life over demanding gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps and games, value the convenience of 65W fast charging, and are willing to invest more for a premium chipset.