OnePlus Nord 2T vs. Infinix Note 12: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset and blazing-fast 80W charging justify the price premium, offering a smoother experience and reduced downtime. However, the Infinix Note 12 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.5 g (6.49 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jewel Blue, Force Black, Sunset Golden | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | X663, X663C, X663D | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance.
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly quick top-ups.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Higher price point compared to the Infinix Note 12.
- May lack expandable storage options (typical for OnePlus).
OnePlus Nord 2T
- More affordable price point.
- Potentially larger display size for immersive media consumption.
- Acceptable battery life based on endurance rating.
- Slower processor struggles with demanding tasks.
- 33W charging is significantly slower than the Nord 2T.
- Likely inferior camera performance.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 636 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Infinix Note 12. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Note 12’s display size isn’t specified, but typically Infinix focuses on larger screens, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience, though likely at the cost of pixel density. The Nord 2T’s panel is likely to offer more accurate color reproduction, a common strength of OnePlus displays.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the Nord 2T’s higher processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on the Note 12’s camera suggests a more basic implementation, likely focusing on affordability over image quality. We can assume the Nord 2T will offer more consistent and detailed photos and videos.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, is a significant upgrade over the Infinix Note 12’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm). The Dimensity 1300 features a more advanced CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – versus the Note 12’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Nord 2T will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the Note 12 will likely struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the unspecified mAh capacity of the Infinix Note 12. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W wired charging with PD support is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Infinix Note 12’s 33W charging. This means less time tethered to a wall and more time using the phone. While battery capacity matters, the Nord 2T’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 if you prioritize extreme affordability and a large display for media consumption, accepting compromises in processing power and charging speed. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand a responsive user experience, faster charging, and a more refined camera system, and are willing to invest a bit more for those benefits.