Infinix Note 12 vs. Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and 68W charging significantly outperform the Infinix Note 12’s Helio G88 and 33W charging, despite both phones offering similar battery endurance ratings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184.5 g (6.49 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Jewel Blue, Force Black, Sunset Golden | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | X663, X663C, X663D | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12
- More affordable price point
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Solid performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G88)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster and more efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Significantly faster charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Higher price compared to the Infinix Note 12
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- May require more frequent charging if heavily used
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1004 nits, compared to the Infinix Note 12’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better outdoor visibility for the Edge 30 Neo. While both displays are likely LCD panels given the price points, the Edge 30 Neo’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggest superior image quality. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Edge 30 Neo’s smaller overall size may contribute to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro lens. However, without specific sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera quality. The Edge 30 Neo’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 695 likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. We can assume the Edge 30 Neo will have better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Infinix Note 12 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm), while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 12nm Helio G88. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also provide a performance edge over the Helio G88’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This means the Edge 30 Neo will handle demanding apps and games more smoothly. The 5G modem in the Snapdragon 695 is a key advantage for future-proofing.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Infinix Note 12 likely having a larger battery capacity to compensate for the less efficient Helio G88. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo supports 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Infinix Note 12’s 33W wired charging. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 if you need a highly affordable smartphone with a large display and don't prioritize 5G connectivity or exceptionally fast charging. It's ideal for users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more modern chipset with 5G capabilities, significantly faster charging speeds, and a brighter display, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.