Infinix Note 12 VIP vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 offers a significant performance advantage over the Helio G96, and the 1003 nit display provides excellent visibility. However, the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s 120W charging is a game-changer for those who value speed above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 VIP | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 16 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 13mm f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cayenne grey, Force black | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | X672 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 290 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12 VIP
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (17 minutes to full)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Good battery endurance (101h)
- Less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Camera performance is unknown
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 5G chipset
- Bright 1003 nit display
- Excellent battery endurance (101h)
- Slower 67W charging (38 minutes to full)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience some thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1003 nits, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility. While the Note 12 VIP’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s unlikely to match this level of brightness. The Poco F4’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a strong AMOLED panel, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on flagship models, but both likely offer a 120Hz panel. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing for the Infinix Note 12 VIP. The Poco F4’s camera performance will depend heavily on its main sensor and image processing algorithms. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess the Note 12 VIP’s camera capabilities, but it’s reasonable to assume the Poco F4 will offer a more refined and versatile camera experience given Xiaomi’s established camera expertise. The presence of OIS on the Poco F4 would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, deliver significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Helio G96 is capable for everyday tasks, it will struggle with demanding games and applications compared to the Snapdragon 870. The Poco F4 likely benefits from faster RAM (LPDDR5) compared to the Note 12 VIP, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. However, the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 17 minutes. The Poco F4’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes considerably longer at 38 minutes. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The Poco F4 supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering broader compatibility with chargers, while the Note 12 VIP’s 120W charging requires a compatible adapter.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 VIP if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to compromise on peak performance. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves with low battery and need a quick top-up. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. It’s the better choice for power users and those who value a brighter, more vibrant display.