Infinix Note 12 VIP vs. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Deep Dive into Speed and Efficiency
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and aren't heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem, the Infinix Note 12 VIP offers compelling value. However, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G wins for overall performance, software experience, and long-term reliability thanks to its more efficient Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 VIP | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 16 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.5 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 13mm f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 17 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cayenne grey, Force black | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | X672 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Infinix Note 12 VIP
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Vibrant display (likely AMOLED)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G96)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Better long-term software support from Samsung
- Superior thermal management
- Significantly slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack the 'wow' factor of 120W charging
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the specifics are crucial. The Galaxy A73 5G benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering superior color accuracy and outdoor visibility. The Infinix Note 12 VIP, while likely bright, may not match the A73’s calibration. The A73's panel is also likely to have a higher peak brightness, improving readability in direct sunlight. Bezels are expected to be similar, but Samsung typically excels in minimizing them.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, we can infer based on brand tendencies. Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and consistency across its cameras. The A73 likely features a more refined image processing pipeline, resulting in more natural-looking photos. The Infinix Note 12 VIP may lean towards more saturated colors to appeal to a wider audience. Sensor size is key; if the A73 has a larger main sensor, it will capture more light and detail, especially in low-light conditions. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A73, if present, would further enhance image quality and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significant step up from the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to better power efficiency and reduced heat generation, meaning the A73 will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Snapdragon 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core also provides a noticeable performance boost over the G96’s Cortex-A76. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences favor the Snapdragon, especially in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The A73's GPU will also outperform the G96's.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 12 VIP’s 120W charging is its headline feature, promising a full charge in just 17 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their phones. However, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G’s 25W charging is considerably slower. While the A73 may have a larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the G96's less efficient architecture will likely result in faster battery drain during intensive use. The A73's Snapdragon 778G will offer better standby battery life due to its superior power efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 VIP if you need incredibly fast charging – topping up from 0-100% in under 20 minutes – and enjoy a vibrant display, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a smoother, more consistent user experience, better thermal management for sustained tasks, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software updates and brand reputation.