Infinix Note 12 VIP vs. Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Deep Dive into Charging, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing the absolute fastest charging and don't heavily rely on 5G, the Infinix Note 12 VIP is the clear winner. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers a more efficient processor, 5G connectivity, and a brighter display, making it a better all-rounder for those seeking a balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 VIP | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 16 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 76.7 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.5 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 13mm f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 17 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cayenne grey, Force black | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | X672 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12 VIP
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 17 minutes)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Strong media consumption focus
- Less efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Limited 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are less impressive
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Slower 68W wired charging
- Wireless charging is limited to 5W
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Infinix Note 12 VIP. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the Edge 30 Neo’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘infinite’ (nominal), this is typical marketing language; the real-world benefit lies in its brightness. The Infinix Note 12 VIP’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a focus on cost optimization rather than display excellence. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as on higher-end models.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Motorola Edge 30 Neo likely prioritizes image processing and software features over raw sensor size. The Infinix Note 12 VIP may lean towards a more saturated, vibrant image profile, typical of Infinix’s branding. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The chipset choice defines the core performance difference. The Infinix Note 12 VIP utilizes the Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers superior power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G96. While the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores provide a clock speed advantage (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Kryo 660 Gold), the architectural improvements and process node of the Snapdragon 695 will likely result in smoother multitasking and gaming. The Edge 30 Neo’s 5G modem is a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s charging advantage. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers both 68W wired and 5W wireless charging, providing flexibility. However, the Infinix Note 12 VIP’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 17 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime and is a significant benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Edge 30 Neo’s slower charging speed necessitates longer periods plugged in.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 VIP if you need unparalleled charging speeds – topping up from zero to full in under 20 minutes – and frequently consume media. It’s ideal for users who prioritize convenience and aren’t heavily invested in 5G networks. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more efficient processor for sustained tasks, require 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions.