Infinix Note 12 G96 vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience and brand reliability, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, gamers and those on a tighter budget will find the Infinix Note 12 G96 offers compelling performance for the price, despite compromises in camera and software.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 G96 | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 16 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.8 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Force Black, Snowfall, Sapphire Blue (Jewel Blue) | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | X670 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 210 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12 G96
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially better gaming performance for the price
- More affordable price point
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Less refined software experience
- Display brightness likely lower
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Superior camera system with OIS
- More polished software experience
- Slower 25W charging
- Higher price
- Potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Infinix Note 12 G96. This brightness advantage translates to better outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The lack of refresh rate information for the Infinix Note 12 G96 is a drawback, as the A53 5G’s 120Hz panel provides a smoother scrolling experience. The A53’s higher peak brightness is a clear win for users who frequently use their phones outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality due to Samsung’s established camera processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor size (data not provided). The Infinix Note 12 G96 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The A53’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also a significant advantage, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Infinix is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility, while the A53’s camera system is more likely to offer a consistent and reliable experience.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset offers a performance advantage over the Infinix Note 12 G96’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Exynos 1280 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, a more modern and efficient architecture than the G96’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, the Exynos’ superior CPU and GPU will deliver a smoother experience in demanding applications and games. The G96 is still capable, but the A53 has a clear edge.
Battery Life
Both the Infinix Note 12 G96 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The Infinix Note 12 G96 supports 33W wired charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is limited to 25W. This means the Infinix will likely charge from 0-100% faster, offering a convenience advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the faster charging, the more efficient Exynos chip in the A53 offsets the difference in charging speed in terms of overall usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 G96 if you need a phone primarily for gaming and media consumption, and value fast charging and a lower price tag above all else. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a more versatile camera system, even if it means paying a premium.