Infinix Note 12 G96 vs. Motorola Edge 30 Neo: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, coupled with 68W wired and 5W wireless charging, offers a smoother experience and greater convenience, despite a similar endurance rating to the Infinix.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 G96 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 16 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 16 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.8 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Force Black, Snowfall, Sapphire Blue (Jewel Blue) | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | X670 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12 G96
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Helio G96 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Slower 33W charging
- No 5G connectivity
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- 68W wired and 5W wireless charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life is similar to the Infinix despite faster charging
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Infinix Note 12 G96. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays are likely to have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the Edge 30 Neo’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate information for the Infinix Note 12 G96 suggests it may not match the smoothness potentially offered by the Edge 30 Neo, which is common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the camera experience will likely differ due to image signal processor (ISP) differences within their respective chipsets. Qualcomm’s ISPs generally offer more advanced features and better image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Edge 30 Neo’s more modern chipset suggests a more capable camera system. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 30 Neo, if present, would further enhance its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Infinix Note 12 G96 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 is inherently more power-efficient, leading to better thermal management and potentially less performance throttling during sustained workloads. While the G96’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Kryo 660 Gold), the architectural improvements and process node advantage of the Snapdragon 695 likely result in superior real-world performance, especially in graphically intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the G96.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Infinix Note 12 G96 having an unspecified battery capacity. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s charging capabilities are significantly faster, offering 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging, compared to the Infinix’s 33W wired charging. This means the Edge 30 Neo can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% on the Edge 30 Neo will likely take under an hour, while the Infinix will require considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 G96 if you need a dependable device for everyday tasks and prioritize maximizing value for your money. It’s a strong contender for users who don’t heavily rely on 5G or demanding mobile games. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more refined experience with faster charging, 5G connectivity, and a chipset built on a more efficient 6nm process, offering better long-term performance and potentially lower thermal throttling.