Xiaomi 13 Lite vs. Infinix Note 12 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging and a brighter display, provides a noticeably smoother and more convenient experience. However, the Infinix Note 12 5G remains a viable option for those prioritizing affordability above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Note 12 5G | Xiaomi 13 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 08 | 2023, February 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 14 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.9 x 8 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 159.2 x 72.7 x 7.2 mm (6.27 x 2.86 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 644 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Lite Blue, Lite Pink |
| Models | X671 | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 534143 (v9) GeekBench: 2936 (v5.1), 2434 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Note 12 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset for smoother performance
- 67W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack expandable storage (typical for Xiaomi)
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life (93h endurance)
- 5G connectivity
- Slower Dimensity 810 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Display brightness likely lower
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 938 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Infinix Note 12 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the Xiaomi’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate information for the Infinix Note 12 5G suggests it may not offer the smoother scrolling experience potentially available on the Xiaomi 13 Lite, depending on its implementation.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Xiaomi’s history of prioritizing camera performance even in mid-range devices, it’s reasonable to assume the 13 Lite will offer a more refined camera experience. The absence of details suggests the Infinix Note 12 5G likely relies on software processing to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. We can assume both will have a standard array of lenses, but the Xiaomi is likely to have better image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) is architecturally superior to the Infinix Note 12 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 utilizes a Cortex-A710 prime core, offering better single-core performance than the Cortex-A76 in the Dimensity 810. Furthermore, the 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 results in improved power efficiency and thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is also more balanced than the Dimensity 810’s (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55).
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 93 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite the Infinix Note 12 5G’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Xiaomi 13 Lite’s 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 40 minutes. The Infinix Note 12 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to replenish the battery. This faster charging speed on the Xiaomi 13 Lite translates to less downtime and greater convenience for users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Note 12 5G if you need a reliable 5G phone with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize maximizing value for your money. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Lite if you prefer a more refined user experience, faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a chipset capable of handling more demanding applications and games.